News Update

CX - Issue which is raised before the Bench pertains to an order relating to the rate of duty of excise - In the light of statutory embargo laid down in s.35G(1), appeals are not maintainable: HCIndia, EU to work together at COP26GST - Petitioner is made to run from pillar to post only because data of IGST refund is not transmitted from GSTN to ICEGATE - That is not petitioner's problem - Refund to be granted along with interest @9% and costs of Rs.25000/-: HCIndia Internet Governance Forum to be held in Nov 2021GST - Respondent had scrupulously followed s.75(4) but it was the appellant who chose not to avail the opportunities of personal hearing - no violations of principles of natural justice: HCMoS felicitates toppers of Civil Services Exam 2020US also successfully tests Hypersonic missile techSales tax dues cannot be recovered against a private limited company by attaching personal property belonging to company's Managing Director : HCEU leaders support sanctions proposal against Poland over violation of rule of lawNITI Aayog's Atal Mission launches digi-book 'Innovations for You'China turns angry eyeball towards business publication; removes Caixin from Internet Regulator’s listCX - Till 2016 amendment, it was the option of assessee either to avail entire credit in one unit or to distribute in their different units therefore, taking credit in one unit is not illegal or wrong: CESTATGovt notifies Gold Bond Scheme 2021-22; Scheme to have distinct series for every trancheI-T - Error of stating tax payable as total income, when filing ITR, does not amount to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income : HCRBI amends Regulations for debt instruments to define InvIT and REITI-T - Order passed by NFAC is unsustainable where assessee is not given personal hearing & replies to SCN are not considered: HCCOVID-19: Daily caseload climbs to 4.5 lakh, globally + death count rockets beyond 7100 including 232 in India & 115 in UKI-T - Purchases made against cash cannot be deemed to be bogus based on presumptions alone : HCKerala to receive fresh rains; At least 65 killed in Uttarakhand floodsI-T - Term 'put to use' in proviso to sec. 36(1)(iii) is applicable to capital asset & income-earning apparatus facilitating business activity : HCIndia finalising guidelines to export refurbished weapons to friendly nationsI-T - Since difference in valuation between value determined by stamp duty authority and declared as sale consideration is less than 10%, no addition is warranted u/s. 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) : ITATG20 fails to agree on phasing out coalI-T - AO's order that does not reflect proof of enquiry of proposed disallowance can be set aside u/s 263 as being erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue :ITATWHO says over 1.8 lakh doctors may have succumbed to COVID-19I-T - Interest income earned by co-operative society from co-operative bank is allowed as deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) : ITATGoogle trims subscription fee for Play Store to 15% from Jan 2022I-T - AO's order, passed after conducting necessary enquiries and considering entire material available on record, cannot be set aside u/s 263 as being erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue : ITATDelta’s sub-variant AY.4.2 turns out to be more transmissible, says RussiaNext Pandemic knocking on Door! A Siren in Time would certainly save Nine!
 
TIOL Awarded WCO Certificate of Merit

TIOL-DDT 1538
28.01.2011
Friday

IN a glittering function at Delhi 's National Museum , Chairman of the Central Board of excise and Customs, Shri Dutt Mazumder presented the WCO Certificate of Merit to Shri Shailendra Kumar, CEO of Taxindiaonline.com for rendering exceptional service to the international Customs Community.

The other awardees in this category were Shri R K Jain, Editor of Excise Law Times and Shri Naval H Mehta, CHA Advisor.

Legal Corner IconLegal Corner Icon
Dr. Awadesh Kumar Singh, AD, NACEN receiving award from CBEC Chairman S Dutt Majumder R K Jain, Editor, ELT, receiving award from CBEC Chairman S Dutt Majumder

The Chairman also presented the certificates of merit to seven distinguished officers of the Department who had all made immense contribution in the field of Customs Knowledge, who were all lustily cheered by the elite audience. But the loudest and long-standing applause came for Dr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, AD, NACEN. The audience consisted of a large number of probationers from NACEN who all went into raptures seeing their teacher getting the award from the CBEC, Chairman.

Legal Corner Icon

WCO Awardees along with S Dutt Majumder, CBEC Chairman, S K Goyal, Member Customs, CBEC and Salil Bhandari, President, PHD Chamber of Commerce

The Chairman said, No Customs initiative can be successful without the partnership of our stakeholders. I am delighted that this year's celebration in India is being marked by honouring both the Departmental officers and the distinguished people from private initiatives. I have personal experience of interacting with each of them and I can tell you, the Board has made the right choices.

A retired Member told me that there could not have been a better selection than Shri R K Jain and Shri Shailendra for this award.

The function was attended by a galaxy of senior officers from the department including retired Chairmen apart from current and retired Members of the CBEC.

 

Transfer / Transshipment of cargo - CBEC Circular

BOARD has received representationsfrom trade that procedures regarding international transhipment of cargo arriving from a foreign destination and proceeding to a foreign destination via an airport in India from one flight to another needs to be simplified in order to ensure an efficient Cargo Transfer Facility and to reduce dwell time.

In order to redress the issue and to simplify the procedure, Board has decided that in case of international transhipped cargo (Foreign to Foreign), for the pre-sorted containers wherein Cargo does not require segregation, ramp to ramp or tail to tail transfer of cargo can be effected, provided the same is carried out under preventive supervision on payment of MOT and Observance of Cargo Transfer Manifest (CTM) procedure. In these cases, transhipment Cargo meant for destination abroad need not be sent to Cargo warehouses. In the case of containers other than pre sorted containers, the existing procedure for transhipment of Cargo (Foreign to Foreign) would continue to apply.

Circular No. 6/2007 - Cus Dated 22.01.2007 is modified.

CBEC Circular No. 8/2011 - Cus; dated January 28, 2011

This Circular was issued today and DDT brings it to you today!

Self Assessment in Customs - CBEC's Vision

ADDRESSING the International Customs Day Celebrations, the CBEC Chairman Shri Dutt Mazumder said, We must continuously modernize our Customs administration. We have implemented EDI in Customs through Version 1.00. Now we are in the process of migration to a more robust system, Version 1.5.0. This would enable us to undertake many more systems modernization schemes. Once RMS is stabilized, we are in the process of having a robust PCA Post Clearance Audit. We realized, just as we have self assessment in Central Excise and Service Tax, we must also have self assessment in Customs.

In fact three days ago, the Chairman had announced in the presence of the Finance Minister, during the investiture ceremony that, our vision is to have self assessment in Customs, as soon as we implement PCA successfully.

The Chairman noted that Customs Revenue Collections were extremely good, but he said, E e ven as revenue collection continues to be our core competency, we cannot ignore the overreaching requirement of trade facilitation and tax payer friendly processes. There has to be a seamless flow of goods so that transaction cost in international trade is minimized.

To this end, there is a need to modernize the Customs Administration and perhaps Self Clearance and Self Assessment in Customs will be a reality soon.

Excise MRP Notification - Corrigendum issued

THROUGH Notification No. 30/2010-CE (NT) dated December 21, 2010 packaged software or canned software was brought into retail sale price based assessment by amending Notification No. 49/2008-CE (NT), December 24, 2008, with an abatement of 15%. In that amending notification, the Chapter description was given as 8523. Now the Government has further amended this amending notification' to correct the Chapter description to 8523 80 20.

CORRIGENDUM, Dated: January 6, 2011

Provisional Anti-Dumping Notification for PVC Flex Films - Corrigendum issued

THROUGH Notification No. 79/2010-Cus, dated July 30, 2010 anti-dumping duty was provisionally imposed on PVC Flex Film which is valid upto January 29, 2011. Now the Note appended to this Notification is amended as follows:

(i) The words, PVC films and tarpaulins has to be read as tarpaulins; and

(ii) The letters, PVC Rigid Films has to be read as read PVC films.

The effect of this corrigendum is that the provisional anti-dumping duty will not be applicable to PVC Filmsand may be all those who paid anti-dumping duty on PVC Films under this notification can now claim refund.

CORRIGENDUM, Dated: January 24, 2011

CVC Disposed of 804 Cases in December 2010 - Major Penalty Proceedings Recommended against 226 Officers

THE Central Vigilance Commission disposed of 804 cases during December 2010 referred to it for advice. Of these, 667 complaints were sent for necessary action/ATR whereas 48 complaints were sent for investigation and report. No action was required on 123 complaints.

The Commission advised imposition of major penalty against 226 officers including 50 from Department of Communications, 36 from Central Board of Excise & Customs, 23 from Ministry of Railways, 13 from State Bank of India, 10 from Vijaya Bank, 9 from Punjab & Sind Bank, 8 from M.C.D., 7 from Andhra Bank, 6 from Canara Bank, 5 each from Allahabad Bank, Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. & UCO Bank. Remaining 31 cases pertained to different departments of the Government of India and PSUs.

Recoveries to the tune of about Rs.2.78 crore were effected after Commission conducted technical examination of some departments.

Exchange rates for import and export notified

CBEC has notified the exchange rates for February 2011.

Notification No 6/2011,Dated January 27, 2011

Jurisprudentiol Monday's cases

Legal Corner IconCustoms

Customs - Exports - Mis-declaration - Confiscation upheld; Penalty and Fine reduced Letter given to Magistrate not taken as retraction of Statement: CESTAT

The appellant company filed two Shipping Bills both dated 3.4.2003 for export of 9900 pieces of Woven trousers valued atRs.500/- per piece. The total declared FOB value of the goods wasRs.49,50,000/- with a claim of draw back ofRs.5,94,000/-. The appellant company also filed four shipping Bills all dated 3.4.2003 for export of 6120kgsof articles of Nickel Welding Electrodes with declared value ofRs.400/- per kg. The total declared FOB value was Rs.24,48,000/- with a claim of drawback ofRs.3,42,720/-. Both these consignments were consigned to a buyer in Russia .

Income Tax

Income tax - Sec 32 - Is depreciation allowable even when a unit in factory is completely closed, and there is no plan to revive the same? - NO, says ITAT

The assessee company is engaged in the manufacturing and dealing in snack foods, edible oil and MEG/DEG/TEG. It wanted to carry out major modification to its MEG plant. It treated all costs incurred in doing so to work in progress account. The unit started trial production in FY 1993-94. Trial production was carried out up to FY 1997-98 relevant to AY 1998-99. On 29.3.1996, the MEG division was closed. Thus, there was no use of the assets of MEG unit during the previous year relevant to AY 1999-2000. In AY 1999-2000, the assessee capitalized the value of work-in-progress account of MEG Unit and claimed deprecation. Thus, the assessee till such capitalization had treated the line of business as not having been set up.

Service Tax

Service Tax GTA - Payment of Service Tax on GTA by Abu utilizing Credit earned on GTA - Permissible prior to 19.04.2006: CESTAT

In other words, a s far as the issue in question is concerned to the extent it related to the period prior to 19/04/2006, the consistent view taken by the Tribunal is that in view of the explanation clause the assessee would be entitled to avail the benefit of such service tax in order to claim theCENVATCredit thereof.

See our columns Monday for the Judgements.

Until Monday with more DDT

Have a Nice Weekend.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


POST YOUR COMMENTS