News Update

India ranked 48th in global aviation safety rankingMumbai Customs seizes cocaine worth Rs 18 Cr from two foreign nationals4 killed & 9 injured as car rams into truck in AgraDecode Freebies Maze to free Growth GenieST - Technicalities should not come in way in permitting the party to agitate the case on merits before the court of law: HCCentre asks all States to establish price monitoring centres in all districtsGST - The time is still available, since the new registration certificate is on 21.06.2022 and petitioner had attempted to file on 20.07.2022 and period of limitation would be over the next day only, petitioner is entitled to relief: HCISTS charges on transmission of electricity waived for 18 yearsScindia inaugurates direct international flight from Pune to SingaporeCX - As credit has been accumulated due to clearance of excisable goods during Excise Law Regime for export, bar of unjust enrichment is not attracted: CESTATCus - Duty-free imported goods found during search by DRI officers, within Public Bonded Warehouse, cannot be said to have been outside warehouse - duty demand raised thereon is not tenable: CESTATNew low cost 'Powerless Heating System' activated with water can heat food in remote areasI-T- No need to make addition u/s 68 as assessee has sufficiently discharged onus upon him to prove identity, genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness of depositors: ITATG7 caps disagreement over Russian oil price at USD 60 per barrel; Crude price dives down to US 80I-T- Employee's contribution to employee welfare funds can be allowed if deposited before due date of filing return of income u/s. 139(1) of Act: ITATIndia’s Ambassador hands over Padma Bhushan to Sundar Pichai in San FranciscoI-T- It is the duty of the assessee to lead evidence in support of it's claim: ITATFive Earthshot Prize winners declared from India, Oman, UK, Australia and KenyaOrban says Hungary still not in favour of global minimum taxUS Commerce sleuths find Chinese solar exporters dodged US tariffAmerican Judge erases indictment against Huawei CFOSoccer legend Pele down with respiratory infectionAmerica unwraps B-21 Bomber built to deter ChinaIndonesia to pass law banning adulteryAmerican employers add 2.63 lakh jobs in Nov month despite recession in tech sectorRailways' revenue earnings up by 76% in pax segmentTax Congress 2022: Time is ripe to get in bed with New Income Tax Code!CBEC vests powers in certain officers for Central Excise & Service Tax appealsGST - Paper based corrugated sheets attract tax @12%: AAR
 
Export of Service - RULE 6A ofService Tax Rules - IRRELEVANT!

JULY 12,2012

By Khushboo Lunia (Chartered Accountant), D Arvind & Associates

EXPORTERS of services can sigh in relief on identifying that they need not comply with Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules stipulated by notification 36/2012 of Service Tax as it appears to be IRRELEVANT! However the benefits that accrue to them on account of exports appears to be in stake!

The Charging Section (section 66 B) of the Finance Act as amended in 2012 specifies that" there shall be levied a tax (hereinafter referred to as the ST) at the rate of twelve per cent on the value of all services,other than those services specified in the negative list,provided or agreed to be provided in the taxable territory by one person to another and collected in such manner as may be prescribed.”

As understood from the above,the main ingredients for a service tax to be levied are -

1. It should meet the definition of "service” as inserted in the Finance Act in 2012.

2. Must not be listed in the "negative list services” defined under section 65D of the Finance Act 1994

3. The services should be provided or agreed to be provided in the taxable territory

4. By one person to another.

By emphasizing on the words "provided or agreed to be provided in the taxable territory", by implication,if a service is not provided inthe taxable territory then the same is outside the purview of ServiceTax.

When the services are rendered within India except J & k where both the service provider and service recipient are located in India ,there is no difficulty in determining the "taxable territory" as it would be India except in certain cases specified in place of provision of service Rules 2012."India" has been defined under section 65B.

The difficulty arises only when service provider or recipient is located outside India or in J & K. Till 30 th June 2012,the question of taxability of a service in such cases (determination taxable territory in a way ) addressed by Export of Service Rules 2005 and Services (provided from outside India and received in India) Rules 2006.

Now the above two set of Rules have been replaced with a set of Rules called place of provision of service Rules 2012 by Notification No.28/2012 dated 20 th June 2012. These Rules now determine” taxable territory” and consequently taxability of a service rendered when either service provider or a receive recipient is located outside India or in J & K.

Once a taxable service is determined,in terms of Place of Provision of Service Rules,as rendered outside the Taxable Territory,the question of granting exemption under Rule 6A of Service Tax Rules as Export of Service does not arise at all. This is because,once a service is determined to be rendered outside the taxable territory,the charging section 66B will not apply and consequently there is no need to go to service tax Rules to get exemption as Export of Service. This is evidently clear if one were to relook at the charging section 66B which has been reproduced in the beginning of this article.

Now let us look at Rule 6A of Service Tax Rules which determines when a service will be treated as Export of Service

RULE 6A (1) - The provision of any service provided or agreed to be provided shall be treated as export of service when

a. the provider of service is located in the taxable territory

b. the recipient of service is located outside India

c. the service is not a service specified in the section 66D of the Act

d. the place of provision of the service is outside India

e. the payment for such service has been received by the provider of service in convertible foreign exchange; and

f. the provider of service and recipient of service are not merely establishment of a distinct person in accordance with item (b) of Explanation 2 of clause (44) of section 65B of the Act.

Rule 3 of Place of Provision of Service Rules 2012 which is reproduced herein under,defines that the place of provision is recipient of service and only in cases where the location of service receiver is not available in the ordinary course of business; the place of provision of service shall be the location of the provider of service

The Place of provision of service Rules provides exception to above general Rule in certain cases and for the sake of brevity of this articles,I am not discussing suchexceptions.

Once the place of provision is outside India in terms of the above Rule then automatically there will be no service tax as the charging section 66B will not authorise any levy.

When that being the case where is the necessity to apply Rule 6A exemption as Exported Service?

This can be illustrated by way an example

A - Service provider located in India

B - Service receiver located outside India

Scenario 1 - A is a Chartered Accountant rendering auditing services to B in London. As per the Place of Provision rules (rule 3),the place of provision shall be the location of service recipient.

In this case since the place of provision of service is in London,the charging section is not satisfied and hence no service tax can be levied

Scenario 2 - A conducts an IPL match in Australia. As per the place of provision rules (rule 6 of POP) the place of provision of service shall be the place where the event is actually held i.e. Australia. Since the service is provided outside India,it does not satisfy the charging section and therefore no service tax is applicable.

Prior to introduction of place of provision of service Rules 2012,when a service provider is located in India and renders service to other person located outside India,the exemption to service tax is only subject to meeting conditions specified in Export of Service Rules or any other exemption notification applicable to that category of service. Now no such requirement in view of discussion made above.

Impact on CENVAT Credit

Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules will not apply due to the non - applicability of Rule 6A of Service Tax rules as by implication,there is no concept called Export of Service and therefore there is no question of credit of input tax paid on any services used for providing a service which is outside the purview of charging section and hence not chargeable to service tax.

Once it appears that credit is not available,there is no question of Refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT credit Rules.

Law makers should immediately correct this ambiguity and ensure clarity and continuity of Exemption in terms of Export of Service.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Export of service

Lawmakers very well know that services provided in non taxable territory are not chargeable to service tax under Sec 66B, but they defined export of service under Rule 6A and also export of service as non exempted service under Rule 2 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 only with the intention of granting some benefits like input tax refund in such cases. If it is not defined, an exporter of service, say a BPO service provider exporting services cannot either take the CENVAT on input services not claims any export benefits. Pls don't write articles with skin deep understanding.

Posted by Raghavendra Rao
 
Sub: No ambiguity

No ambiguity here. Once service is provided outside taxable territory, no service tax is payable. But that will not automatically become export of service. To qualify as export of service, the conditions in Rule 6A should be satisfied. if it qualifies as export, all benefits meant for export would be allowed. if it does not satisfy the conditions under Rule 6A, it will remain non taxable, but will not attain the status of export. Rule 6 A is not an exemption from payment of ST.

Natarajan


Posted by jaikumar seetharaman
 
Sub: Need clarification

We have a company in india. We provide software service to company in USA.. but when they transfer the fund.. they convert it in INR and we receive money in INR via NEFT... We are running this business from 3 year.. Are we under service tax liability?

Posted by Gaurav Agrawal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Hon’ble Finance Minister of Tamil Nadu, Shri P Thiaga Rajan, speaking about Dr Manmohan Singh after conferment of TIOL Fiscal Heritage Award 2022 on Nov 8, at Taj Palace, New Delhi



TIOL Tax Congress - 4th Technical Session - GST 2.0 - The Next Frontiers




Shri V K Garg, Ex-IRS & Tax Professional makes presentation titled, 'The Canvas of Taxation by 2047', at TIOL Tax Congress 2022 on Nov 7, 2022