News Update

86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentI-T- Re-assessment unsustainable, where based on third party statements & not corroborated by incriminating evidence: ITATRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoI-T- Re-assessment invalidated where triggerred by change of opinion, on account of being based on material already available during original assessment: ITATInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorST - Civil work for construction of tower in port area, is exempt from tax as per Notfn No 25/2007-ST; constructing draining pipes for municipal corporation is not commercial activity & so no Service Tax is payable thereon: CESTATUS alleges Russia shipping oil to North Korea more than UN-fixed quotaCus - That appellants were aware of dutiable nature of Gold found from baggage & of procedure for declaration at Customs, reveals intent to smuggle said Gold without payment of tax - conditions for valid import of Gold not satisfied either; absolute confiscation upheld: CESTATUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to HuaweiCX - Excise duty is determines based on how goods are cleared - What happens to goods post their removal, is not manufacturer's lookout, unless manufacturer is involved in fraud or wilful mis-declaration: CESTATRenewables accounted for 30% of global power supply in 2023: StudyCX - Manufacturer of Single Sugar Phosphate (SSP) meant for agricultural use, cannot be held liable for use of SSP for industrial purposes, by a tertiary purchaser of SSP: CESTATCLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1ST - Since the demand itself is not sustainable, question of demanding interest and imposing penalty does not arise: CESTAT
 
ST - Applicant providing technical knowhow service - although they have made entries in books, they have not received any amounts for providing service - prior to May, 2008, ST was payable only on receipt basis - Stay granted: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 06, 2012: THE applicant is a manufacturer of bulk drugs and they are having separate Research and Development Division and they are providing technical knowhow service to M/s. Doctors Organics Chemical Ltd. and M/s. Bravo Healthcare Limited during the period April 2004 to March 2009. They have raised invoices to these concerns for providing the service of technical knowhow and business auxiliary services.

Alleging that Service tax is payable, a demand was raised and the same has been confirmed by the CCE, Raigad.

The applicant is before the CESTAT seeking waiver of pre-deposit of Rs.1,56,71,018/- along with interest and various penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994.

It is submitted that -

+ the applicant has not received any amounts towards providing the above service, therefore, they are not liable to pay any service tax at all.

+ prior to May, 2008 service tax was payable on actual receipt of the amount of service rendered from the service recipient.

+ It is a fact on record that only entries were made in the books of accounts of service recipient as well as the service provider but no amount for service rendered has been recovered.

+ the adjudicating authority has classified their service of ‘technical knowhow' under the category of 'Scientific and Technical Consultancy Service' and which is improper so they are not liable to pay service tax post May, 2008 also.

The Revenue representative submitted that as the appellant has raised invoices for technical know services which is correctly classified by the adjudicating authority under the category of ‘Scientific and Technical Consultancy Services', it is immaterial whether they have received or not the amount for service rendered.

The Bench observed -

"5. … Prima facie we are convinced with the argument advanced by the learned counsel that, prior to May, 2008 service tax is payable on receipt basis and it is a fact on record that the applicant has not received any amount towards rendered service at all although they have made entries in their books of account. Therefore, prima facie they have made out a case for the period prior to May, 2008. Further, we have gone through the definition of ‘Scientific and Technical Consultancy Services' as defined under Section 65(92) of the Finance Act, 1994 and we are of the view that the applicant does not qualify under the said definition also. Therefore, the applicant have made out a case for 100% waiver of pre-deposit for the period post May, 2008 also."

Holding that the applicant had made out a case for complete waiver of the pre-deposit of the adjudged dues, Stay was granted.

(See 2012-TIOL-1789-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.