News Update

India received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
CENVAT credit availed on bought out items - denial of credit - final product exported along with bought out items - rebate claim to be kept pending till appeal is disposed of in matter of CENVAT credit: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 21, 2012: THIS is an application for Stay by the Revenue against an order-in-original passed by the CCE, Pune-I.

It is contention of the Revenue that the show cause notice was issued for denial of credit of Rs.5.91 Crores which the respondents had wrongly taken in respect of the bought out items which were not required for their final product nor the value of such goods were added to the assessable value of the finished goods. Inasmuch as the finding of the adjudicating authority that the respondents are entitled to claim rebate (provided they satisfy the Jurisdictional Central Excise officer that the impugned goods have in fact been exported and also that all other conditions are satisfied) is beyond the scope of show cause notice is the submission of the Revenue and hence the application for Stay.

The respondent assessee submitted that they had also filed an appeal against the impugned order and the Tribunal vide Stay order dt. 1.08.2012 waived the pre-deposit of dues after taking into consideration the fact that the amount of credit is already reversed and that the appeal is pending.

The Bench observed -

"5. We find that the show cause notice was issued to deny the credit wrongly availed by the respondent in respect of the bought out items, the value of which is not included, in the assessable value of the finished goods. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of CENVAT Credit availed by the applicant. In these circumstances, we direct that the rebate claim if filed by the respondents to be kept pending till the disposal of the appeal.

6. Registry is directed to list this appeal along with Appeal no. E/1094/2012-Mum."

In passing: Max to Max for "interest" see 2008-TIOL-1089-CESTAT-MUM.

(See 2012-TIOL-1908-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.