News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
ST - M & M Ltd is legal entity which has two separate divisions - appellant is logistics division which provided logistics services to Farm Equipment Division - merely by taking separate ST registrations it cannot be said that both are separate legal entities - demand not sustainable: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 24, 2012: THE appellant are the logistic division of M/s. Mahindra and Mahindra Limited. They are providing various logistics services to another division - Farm Equipment Sector (FES) Division of Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.

A show cause notice was issued for demand of service tax for the logistics services provided by the appellant to their FES division for the period 15/12/2007 to March 2010.

The demand of Rs.82,17,904/- was confirmed by the CCE, Nagpur along with interest and various penalties and so the appellant is before the CESTAT.

The appellant submitted that they are one of the divisions of M/s Mahindra and Mahindra Limited and by taking separate service tax registration it cannot be held that both the divisions are separate legal entity; therefore, demand for the period 15/12/2007 to 10/09/2008 is not sustainable.

With respect to the demand for the period 11/09/2008 to March, 2010, it is submitted that since the appellant had become a separate legal entity and they were registered at their Mumbai office who discharged the service tax liability on the service rendered by them at Nagpur, the demand cannot be confirmed and since this fact could not be verified during the course of adjudication the matter may be remanded back for verification from the Range Superintendent of Mumbai.

The Revenue representative reiterated the impugned order and further submitted that as the appellant did not produce any relevant documents at the time of adjudication, pandora's box cannot be opened at this stage as to whether they have paid the service tax or not?

The Bench observed -

"6. Considering the submissions made by the learned Chartered Accountant we find that Mahindra and Mahindra Limited is a legal entity which is having two separate divisions. Merely by taking two separate service tax registrations it cannot be said that both are separate legal entities. Therefore, demand for the period 15/12/2007 to 10/09/2008 is not sustainable.

7. For the remaining period, the matter needs examination by the adjudicating authority after obtaining reports from the Range Superintendent of Mumbai whether the appellant has paid the service tax or not. For this purpose the matter is remanded back to the adjudicating authority to verify whether the appellant has paid the service tax for the period 11/09/2008 to March, 2010 thereafter to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law."

The appeal as well as the stay application was disposed of in the above terms.

Defying logic:

Pandora's Box is an artifact in Greek mythology, taken from the myth of Pandora's creation in Hesiod's Works and Days. The "box" was actually a large jar given to Pandora, which contained all the evils of the world.

(See 2012-TIOL-1919-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.