News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
Cus - Argument that flash memory and memory cards are different has no technical basis - since product satisfies description given in notification, benefit of CVD allowed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, FEB 21, 2013: THE appellant filed bills of entry for import of ‘flash memory cards' under CTH no. 8523 5100 and claimed exemption under notification no. 24/05-Cus dated 1.3.2005 and concessional CVD of 4% under notification 6/2006-CE dated 1.3.2006. The concessional rate of CVD was denied by the original adjudicating authority on the ground that the flash memory card imported by the appellant did not have any plug to function or serve as a plug-in-device and the goods were mostly and widely used in cell phones and cameras.

The appellant preferred an appeal before the lower appellate authority. The lower appellate authority held that the notification refers to "Flash memory" meant for external use with a computer as plug-in-device and not to flash memory card and flash memory is only a component or a part used in the flash memory and, therefore, the benefit of exemption would not be available.

Hence the appellant is before the CESTAT.

It is submitted that the flash memory card imported by the appellant is the same product as specified in the notification "flash memory" which falls under CTH 8523 5100 and it is meant for external use with a computer or a laptop as a plug-in-device. The appellant also produced the product literature relating to the impugned goods which showed that the product under importation is a solid state digital memory card having no moving parts and it is a device which can be externally plugged into a computer or a laptop in addition to other devices such as mobile phones and cameras. It is further submitted that a plug-in-device need not necessarily have a separate plug mechanism and so long as it can be fitted in to provide an electric connection, it would be eligible for the benefit of the notification.

The Revenue representative reiterated the finding of the lower authorities.

The bench after extracting the entry no. 17 in the notification 6/2006-CE wherein the goods "Flash memory" is mentioned observed -

"5. …Heading 8523 5100 covers "solid state non-volatile storage device." There is no dispute of the fact that the item under importation is a solid state non-volatile storage device. The only dispute is that whether flash memory and flash memory card are the same or are they different. The Notification refers to flash memory meant for external use with a computer or laptop a plug-in-device. The goods under importation satisfy this description. Therefore, the argument of the lower appellate authority that flash memory and flash memory cards are different items has no sound technical basis. The product literature available on record clearly indicates that the item under importation is a solid state memory card and is meant for external use with a computer or laptop as a plug-in-device. The product literature further states that these cards can be plugged in without the need for an adapter. Thus, from the product literature, it is clear that the product under importation satisfies the description given on the Notification."

In fine, the order passed by the lower authority was set aside and the appeal allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2013-TIOL-341-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.