News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - Whether for purpose of provisions of Sec 50C, valuation of sold plot of land can be modified if it is a distress sale - NO: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, MAR 21, 2013: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether for the purpose of provisions of Sec 50C, the valuation of the sold plot of land can be modified if it is a distress sale. And the answer is NO.

Facts of the case

The
assessee had sold a portion of the land of its factory property for a consideration of Rs.2,22,64,409/ which was as per the sale deed. At the same time, the guideline value adopted by the registering authority was Rs.3,95,91,000/-. In the computation of LCTG the assessee adopted the consideration at Rs.2,22,64,409/-. But, the AO held that the guideline value of Rs.3,95,91,000/- must be adopted. The (DVO) valued the property at Rs.3,54,73,536/- But the Valuation Report was not available before completing the assessment. The AO completed by adopting the guideline value of Rs.3,95,91,000/-. The CIT(A) determined the consideration at Rs.2.25 crores.

On Appeal before the Tribunal the DR contended that section 50C was binding on the AO. The DR further contended that the CIT(A) had grossly erred in interfering in the quantum of sale consideration without understanding the predicament of the AO and without hearing the objections of the AO. The AR contended that it was a distress sale, as the property was sold by the assessee to pay off the bank liabilities.

Having heard the parties, the Tribunal held that,


++ section 50C(1) is a deeming provision. A deeming provision is to be strictly applied without widening its scope. But it is also equally important to note that a deeming provision is inflexible. Where a deeming provision states a particular mode of operation, that mode should be adopted and it cannot be diluted or distinguished or differentiated;

++ the factors, however heartening may be, cannot be acted upon by the appellate authorities for the reason that section 50C is a deeming provision. Any relief granted to an assessee must be on the basis of reasons. The misfortunes happened to the assessee or the difficulties faced by the assessee or the matter of distress sale, etc. cannot be a ground to modify the valuation;

++ the DVO’s estimation was at Rs.3,54,73,536/-. When all these variables are changing from time to time, from authority to authority, it is not possible to reject the contentions of the assessee as a whole. The truth lies somewhere in between. We refix the consideration accountable in the hands of the assessee for the purpose of section 50C at Rs.2.5 crores.

(See 2013-TIOL-204-ITAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.