News Update

US Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
ST - Appellant collecting development and maintenance fees from flat buyers to discharge payments towards local taxes, water and electricity charges - prima facie such activity undertaken in capacity of executor is not liable to ST under category of 'Management, maintenance or repair services' - Stay granted: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JULY 11, 2013: THE appellants are engaged in the construction of residential flats. During the sale of the flats before handing over the possession of such flats, the appellant collected the development and maintenance fees from the flat buyers as the promoter is liable to discharge payments towards outgoing expenses including any municipal local taxes, property tax, water charges, electric charges, revenue assessment or interest or any mandatory charges under the provisions of Section 5 of Maharashtra Ownership flats (Regulation) Act, 1963. On completion of construction while handing over the possession, the developer returns the balance amount, if any, after debiting the expenses.

The department was of the view that the activity undertaken by the appellant comes under the category of ‘Management, maintenance and repair services'.

Accordingly, a Service Tax demand of Rs. 10,44,855/- was confirmed by the CCE, Thane-I including the demand towards GTA services amounting to Rs. 9,492/-.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant submitted -

+ The appellant has collected the amount from flat owners as under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation) Act, 1963, as the appellant was obliged to discharge property tax, water and electricity tariff etc. on behalf of the flat owners and the appellant has undertaken these activities in the capacity of an executor. Therefore, the appellant has not rendered any management, maintenance or repair services and hence demand is not sustainable in law.

+ In respect of the various services such as cleaning services, lift maintenance etc. individual service providers have discharged the Service Tax liability.

The Bench observed -

"5. After carefully considering the submissions made by both the sides and after perusing the provisions of Section 5 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flat (Regulation) Act, 1963, we are of the view that the appellant has made out a strong case in their favour for grant of waiver from pre-deposit…."

In fine, the CESTAT granted unconditional waiver from pre-deposit of the dues adjudged and stayed the recovery.

In passing: See 2008-TIOL-1721-CESTAT-MUM for some reality bites!

(See 2013-TIOL-1051-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.