News Update

India to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarLabour Party candidate Sadiq Khan wins record third term as London MayorArmy convoy ambushed in Poonch sectorDeadly floods evict 70K Brazilians out of homes; 57 killed so farGovt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha Elections7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implication
 
Service Tax is leviable on rendering of services - therefore, it is rate prevalent on date of rendering of service, which is relevant for levy of Service Tax - appeal allowed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 27, 2013: A service tax demand of a princely sum of Rs.20,296/- was confirmed against the appellant on the "Commercial Training or Coaching" services rendered by them during the period July, 2004 to October, 2004. The appellant contested that for the period prior to 10.09.2004, the rate of Service Tax leviable was 8% and w.e.f 10.09.2004, the applicable rate was 10%. Therefore, for the services rendered prior to 10.09.2004, they are liable to pay Service Tax only @8% even though they raised bills after 10.09.2004. This contention of the appellant was rejected and the Service Tax demand was confirmed by the lower authorities.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant submitted -

(i) As per Board's Circular no. 62/11/2003-ST dated 21.08.2003 in para 3.2 thereof, it has been clarified as follows:-

3.2It is a basic principle that no tax can be charged except under authority of law. Thus, if the levy of service tax on a particular service comes into force on a given date, that service will not be taxable if rendered before that date. The levy of service tax on "Maintenance or repair service" has come into force on 1-7-2003. Accordingly any maintenance or repair service rendered prior to 1-7-2003 will not be taxable, irrespective of when the bills are raised or payment made. This will apply to other services as well which were rendered prior to the imposition of service tax on them.

(ii) Rule 6 of the STR, 1994 makes it clear that the receipt of payment for the services rendered is not relevant for determination of the tax and it is the date on which service has been rendered which is relevant and if during the period, the services were not taxable, the same cannot be taxed merely because the payment has been made afterwards. Reliance is placed on the decision in Ashok Kumar Jain, Prop. Vs. CCE, Indore - (2011-TIOL-2008-CESTAT-DEL).

The Bench observed -

"5.1 Service Tax is leviable on the rendering of services. Therefore, it is the rate prevalent on the date of rendering of the service, which is relevant for levy of Service Tax. The Board's instruction (supra) and also the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Ashok Kumar Jain (supra) confirm this view. Recently, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Ratan Singh Builders Pvt. Ltd. - (2013-TIOL-403-HC-DEL-ST) held that the rate that should be applied for levy of Service Tax is the rate prevalent on the date of rendering the services and not the rate applicable on the date of receipt of payment. Following these decisions, which apply to facts of the present case, we allow the appeal with consequential relief, if any, in accordance with law."

(See 2013-TIOL-1273-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.