SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
CX - interest liability arises under provisions of Section 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944, and even prior to 11.05.2001: CESTAT Larger Bench

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, SEPT 27, 2013: THE issue referred to the Larger Bench in these cases is:

"whether interest on duty/ cenvat credit demanded by applying proviso to Section 11A or Section 11AA with Cenvat Credit Rules or under Rule 57(I), is payable under Section 11AB prior to 11.05.01."

The Department's AR submitted that the issue is directly covered by the judgement of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Exotic Associates Vs. CCE - (2010-TIOL-59-HC- AHM -CX).

The Larger observed that the High Court of Gujarat after considering all the submissions and considering provisions of Section 11AB prior to 11.05.01 and post 11.05.01, laid down a ratio at paragraph No.18 as follows.

"18. So far as the appeal filed by the revenue is concerned, the Tribunal has deleted the interest only on the ground that the demand relates to the period of 1997 to 2000 and on that count, it was held that no interest is leviable in respect of demand prior to 11-5-2001. It is, however, contended before us that while taking the said view, the Tribunal has only considered the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 11AB brought on the Statute Book by the Act 14 of 2001 with effect from 11-5-2001. Prior to the said provision, Section 11AB was inserted by Section 76 of Finance (No.2) Act of 1996 with effect from 28-9-1996. It appears that the Tribunal relied on the non-applicable provisions, namely, amended Section 11AB . This amended Section 11AB would not apply to the cases where Section 11AB was inserted by Section 76 of Finance ( No.2 ) Act, 1996, effective from 28-9-2006 and demand related to a period subsequent thereto, i.e. between the period from 28-9-1996 and 11-5-2001. Sub-section (2) of Section 11AB specifically states that the provision of Sub-section (1) of Section 11AB shall not apply to cases where the duty had become payable on the date on which Finance Act, 2001 received the assent of the President. It was, therefore, open and permissible to levy interest under Section 11AB for the period subsequent to 28-9-1996 under the unamended provision of Section 11AB of the Act."

The Larger Bench found that the issue as referred to the Larger Bench, is now squarely decided by the High Court of Gujarat. Accordingly reference to the several precedents by the counsel for the assessee, would be only of academic interest, since the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat in the case of Exotic Associates was considering the very same point which is referred to this Larger Bench.

Held: interest liability arises on the appellants under the provisions of Section 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944, and even prior to 11.05.2001.

(See 2013-TIOL-1429-CESTAT-AHM-LB)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.

TOP NEWS


AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST