News Update

US Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
Cus - CVD - Import of Avianceslimline Lipsticks SPF 5 - for purpose of CVD, transaction value as per s.4 should be taken as AV and not on basis of s 4A as lipsticks of weight 2.2 gm/pc is not subject to SWAM Act, 1976 - Appeal allowed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, NOV 02, 2013: THE facts of the case are that the appellants imported a consignment of lipsticks and as per the invoice the goods were 3456 pcs x 8 shade totaling 27648 pcs blue Avianceslimline lipsticks SPF 5 with weight of 2.2.gm/pc. It is the contention of the appellants that for the purpose of CVD on the imported goods, transaction value as per Sec. 4 of CEA, 1944 should be taken as assessable value and not on the basis of Sec. 4A of the Act as lipsticks weighing 2.2 gms a piece is not subject to the Standard of Weights and Measures Act, 1976.

Both the lower authorities did not accept the contention of the appellants and asked them to make the payment of differential duty on the basis of the MRP.

Aggrieved by the said order, the appellants are before the CESTAT. The year is 2003.

After ten years, the matter was heard finally.

The appellants submitted that identical issue came up before theTribunal in the case of M/s. Pidilite Industries Ltd. wherein Fevistick/Gluestick/Prime Stick having weight 5 gms or 8 gms were imported and in that case, the Tribunal had vide order No. A/973-986/13/CSTB/C-I dated 2.4.2013 (2013-TIOL-1592-CESTAT-MUM) held that duty is to be paid as per Section 4 i.e. transaction value of the impugned goods and the provisions of Standard of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 are not applicable and the appellants are not required to pay duty on the basis of MRP.

The Revenue representative reiterated the order of the lower authority and submitted that as the goods are imported in numbers, therefore, there is no concern with the weight and Rule 34 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules 1977 provides that if the goods are sold in numbers they are required to affix MRP.

The Bench held that since in similar issue concerning M/s. Pidilite Industries Ltd. the CESTAT had held that although the goods are sold in numbers, they are not required to pay duty on MRP as having the weight less than 10 gms per pc, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2013-TIOL-1630-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.