News Update

Govt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
ST - As per Rule 6(3) of STR adjustment for excess service tax paid is only in respect of services which are not provided by service provider - adjustments in respect of volume discounts and other rebates is prima facie not covered - pre-deposit ordered: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, NOV 03, 2013: THE applicants are providing port service and paying Service Tax. They had suomotu adjusted the amounts in question by citing the provisions of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994.

The demand of Rs.1,64,01,668/-, interest and penaltiesis confirmed by the CCE, Raigad on the ground that the adjustment of the excess service tax paid is available only in respect of the taxable service which is not provided by the service provider and the amount has been refunded to the person from whom it was received . However, the applicants had adjusted the amounts which are not in respect of the services not provided .

Before the CESTAT, the appellant submitted that in respect of the amount of adjustment, verification was conducted by the Deputy Commissioner of Service Tax; that as the applicants had refunded the amounts of service tax collected from the service recipient by way of credit notes, therefore, the adjustment is permissible and the demand is not sustainable.

The Revenue representative relied upon the provisions of Rule 6(3) of the STR, 1994 and submitted that the adjustment can be done in respect of the service which is not provided by the service provider and the amount of service tax has been refunded to the person from whom it was received. In the present case the applicants were giving some volume discounts and other rebates and the ST paid on such amounts were adjusted against the payment of service tax for subsequent period, which is not permissible and hence the demand is rightly made.

The Bench extracted the contents of Rule 6(3) of the STR, 1994 and observed -

“…In the present case, the adjustments are made in respect of volume discounts and other rebates as noted in para 15.2 of the adjudication order.

6. As per the provisions of Rule 6(3) of the Rules, the adjustment in respect of excess service tax paid is only in respect of the services which are not provided by the service provider. In the present case, the adjustment is not in respect of services which are not provided rather it is by way of discounts and rebates. In view of this, prima facie the applicants have not made out a case for total waiver of service tax….”

In fine, the applicant was directed to deposit an amount of Rs.1,00,00,000/- and report compliance.

( See 2013-TIOL-1633-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.