News Update

Govt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
CENVAT - appellant undertakes testing services abroad and pays ST - ST distributed by HO to Daman unit - notwithstanding fact that testing has been done for product yet to be manufactured, it does not disentitle appellant to credit - stay granted: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, NOV 05, 2013: THE appellantis a manufacturer of drugs and pharmaceuticals. They have several manufacturing units situated at Aurangabad, Daman, Chikhalthana, Ankleshwar&Nalagarh, HimachalPradesh. They have a research centre at Aurangabad. The appellant undertook certain technical testing and analyzing services abroad and discharged the service tax liability of Rs.12,83,884/- during May 2006 on reverse charge basis.

The said service tax was distributed by the appellant's Head Office at Mumbai to their unit at Daman.

Revenue objected to this distribution on the ground that testing and analyzing service has been availed in respect of a product yet to be manufactured by the appellant and it is not evident that the product is manufactured at Daman and, therefore, the distribution of credit to Daman unit was not in accordance with the law.

Accordingly, the credit was denied and sought to be recovered along with interest and also imposing penalties.

The Commissioner (A), Vapi sided with the adjudicating authority and hence the appellant is before the CESTAT.

It is submitted that testing and analyzing services undertaken by them is part of their manufacturing and business activity and, therefore, it is an eligible input service as defined in Rule 2(l) of the CCR, 2004. It is further submitted that notwithstanding the fact that testing has been done in respect of a product yet to be manufactured by the appellant, if does not disentitle them to the credit as held by Tribunal in the case of Cadila Healthcare Ltd., Vs. CCE, Ahmedabad - 2010-TIOL-59-CESTAT-AHM and affirmed by the Gujarat High Court 2013-TIOL-12-HC-AHM-ST; that distribution of entire credit on testing and analysingservice by the Head office to the Daman unit is also not precluded as per the provisions of Rule 7 of CCR, 2004 as it stood at the relevant time. Reliance is also placed on the Karnataka HC decision in the case of CCE, Bangalore Vs. ECOF Industries Pvt. Ltd. - 2011-TIOL-770-HC-KAR-ST.

The Bench adverted to the case laws cited by the appellant and observed that the appellant has made out a prima facie case in their favour for grant of say.

Accordingly, the CESTAT granted unconditional waiver from pre-deposit of dues adjudged against the appellant and stayed recovery.

(See 2013-TIOL-1642-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.