News Update

Govt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
Cus - Applicant claims interest on redemption fine and penalty - when asked under which Rule they are claiming interest, applicant has no answer - as adjudicating authority has refunded amount of RF & penalty, order of Tribunal has been implemented - no merit in case: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAY 11, 2014 : THE following final order was passed by the Tribunal in an appeal filed by the appellant -

"The appellant will be entitled to refund of the redemption fine of Rs.2,00,000/- and penalty of Rs.50,000/- deposited along with interest as per Rules."

THEY are again before the CESTAT with an application seeking implementation of the aforesaid final order.

It is submitted by the applicant that the adjudicating authority has refunded the amount of redemption fine and penalty but has not given any interest on the ground that there is no rule for the same.

When the matter was heard recently by the Bench, the applicant was directed to specify under which Rule they are claiming interest.

The applicant submitted that since the Tribunal had ordered for the same, the department should be directed to implement this order without any delay.

It is further mentioned that money in the bank earns interest and the business also earns profit, therefore, they are entitled for interest on the redemption fine and penalty.

The Member (Judicial) observed -

"6. On a specific query made to the applicant that under which Rule he is claiming interest, for which the applicant has failed to answer. In these circumstances, I hold that the adjudicating authority has implemented the order passed by this Tribunal dated 25.04.2013. Therefore, the application filed by the applicant deserves no merit, hence dismissed."

In passing : Two wrongs don't make a right!

(See 2014-TIOL-745-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.