News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
ST - Retro exemption - s.97 & s.98 - Maintenance of greenery on road divider is apparently covered under maintenance or repair of roads - so also, garden at Raj Bhavan forms a part of government building: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAY 16, 2014: THE appellants are engaged in providing services of maintenance of greenery on road divider as well as maintenance of road, Landscape and gardens, which is part of the Raj Bhavan and belongs to the government of Maharashtra. The activity of maintenance involves cutting of trees in shape, trimming of lawn, watering and cleaning of the weeds.

The jurisdictional Central Excise authorities at Nagpur want Service Tax of Rs.1,45,976/- on the aforesaid activity. Before the adjudicating authority the appellant submitted that services provided in respect of roads are exempted under Section 97. So also, maintenance of garden at Raj Bhavan is exempted under Section 98 of the Finance Act. Both these contentions were rejected on the round that the services have been rendered in respect of landscape and garden and not in respect of road and Government buildings and accordingly the demand was confirmed and penalty imposed under Sections 76, 77 & 78 of the Finance Act.

As the Commissioner(A) dismissed their appeal for non-compliance of the pre-deposit order, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

The Bench observed -

"5. Upon hearing the parties, it appears that the services in relation to the maintenance of road divider is covered under the provisions of Section 97 of the Finance Act, and the garden which is part of the Raj Bhavan forms part of the Government building. Accordingly, this maintenance service is exempt under Section 98 of the Finance Act. It is vehemently argued by the appellant that the appellate Commissioner have failed to consider the case under Sections 97 & 98 and ordered pre-deposit without considering the important aspect in this case."

Holding that in the interest of justice the appellate Commissioner should have considered the applicability of the sections 97 & 98 before passing any order for pre-deposit as the same goes to the root of the matter, the order was set aside and the Commissioner (A) was directed to hear the appeal on merit without any pre-deposit.

The appeal was allowed by way of remand.

In passing: While communicating the changes in Service Tax by the Union Budget, the Board vide D.O.F. No 334/1/2012-TRU Dated: March 16, 2012, under the head "C.4. Retrospective changes", informed -

21. Repair of roads has been exempted from service tax by Notification 24/2009-ST dated 27th July, 2009. By section 97, exemption relating to roads is extended for the earlier period commencing from June 16, 2005;

22. Service tax exemption has also been granted with retrospective effect (by section 98) on management, maintenance or repair service in relation to non-commercial Government buildings from 16th June, 2005 till the coming into force of the negative list when such repair will be exempted by the new mega notification.

(See 2014-TIOL-782-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.