News Update

ICG seizes 86 kg narcotics worth Rs 600 croreChief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan concludes his official visit to France9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand notice
 
Cus - Notfn 102/07 - Refund - without effecting sale amount of SAD refund available is not known to applicant-Commr(A) observing that in ledger a/c SAD is shown as recoverable and hence refund is not admissible is incorrect: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAY 31, 2014: THE appellants are traders and have imported certain goods on payment of SAD. They sold the goods in the open market after charging VAT with an endorsement that CENVAT credit of SAD is not available to the buyers of the goods.

As the goods were imported in terms of notification no. 102/07-Cus they filed a claim for refund of SAD paid by them at the time of importation of the goods.

The refund claim was denied by the adjudicating authority on the ground that the appellants have failed to prove the nexus between the goods sold and the bills of entry.

The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the notification did not require any nexus to be established of importation and sale of the goods; that the only condition is that the applicant is required to sell the goods on payment of VAT/CST and there should be endorsement on the sales invoices that credit of the SAD is not admissible to the buyer.

Having said so, he examined the ledger account of the appellant and said that as the amount of SAD is shown as recoverable only after the sale takes place, the importer is not entitled for the refund claim.

The importer is, therefore, before the CESTAT.

The Bench observed -

"4. Considering the fact that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has gone beyond the issue one step further of the issue before me. In fact, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) held that the appellants have shown the amount recoverable on account of SAD after sale has been effected, is not correct. In fact, without effecting the sale, the amount of refund of SAD available to the applicant was not known. Therefore, the observations of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) are totally irrelevant and incorrect. As the appellant has fulfilled the condition of notification 102/07-Cus and also have been able to prove that the amount of SAD has not passed on the buyer by way of a certificate issued by the Chartered Accountant and an undertaking given by them. In these circumstances, I hold that the appellants are entitled for refund of claim of SAD…"

The appeals were allowed and the adjudicating authority was directed to implement the order within a month.

(See 2014-TIOL-908-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.