News Update

Requisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN HqsCX - Clearance to sister concern for captive consumption - Department cannot compel assessee to perpetuate the illegality and in such circumstances the whole exercise was revenue neutral: HC75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCPM says NO to religion-based reservationCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Since the objective of Central Government in imposing ban with immediate effect was to avert a food crisis in the country, a strict compliance of exemption conditions would further the said intent of the Notification(s): HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesCX - Appellant should not be left without an opportunity to put-forth his case on merits, particularly, when matter was decided during period of Covid-19 pandemic and also appellant contends that no opportunity of virtual hearing was granted by adjudicating authority: HCKiller floods - 228 killed in Kenya + 78 in BrazilI-T - Grant of registration u/s 12A can't be denied by invoking Sec 13(1)(b), as provisions of section 13 would be attracted only at time of assessment and not at time of grant of registration: ITATFlight cancellation case: Qantas accepts USD 66 mn penaltyI-T- Joint ownership in two residential properties at the time of sale of the original asset does not disentitle the assessee to claim of deduction under section 54F of the Act: ITATIsrael shuts down Al Jazeera; seizes broadcast equipmentI-T - If assessee was prevented from production of evidences because of its non-availability or delay in its retrieval coupled with ongoing several reassessment, assessee should be allowed to adduce additional evidence: ITATIndia to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarI-T- If assessee is otherwise found eligible, CIT(E) should grant provisional approval to assessee under Clause (iii) to First Proviso to section 80G(5): ITATLabour Party candidate Sadiq Khan wins record third term as London MayorI-T - Donation made to trust which is otherwise not approved during relevant period as per CBDT Circular, is not eligible for deduction u/s 35(1): ITATGovt scraps ban on export of onionI-T- Assessee could have filed application in Form No.10AB on or before 30.09.2022, which assessee failed to do : ITATUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedI-T- AO erred in making addition for completed/non abated assessment as no incriminating material found during course of search :ITAT
 
Cus – Revenue cannot agitate an issue before CESTAT which issue was not in SCN or taken before Commr(A) - Revenue appeal rejected: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, JUNE 23, 2014 : THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The respondent filed a bill of entry seeking classification of the imported Palm Kernal Acid Oil under CTH 38231900.

Samples were drawn and sent to Chemical Examinerand based on the reports received a SCN was issued for classifying the imported goods under CTH 15132910 and this was upheld by the Assistant Commissioner.

The lower appellate authority decided the classification of the imported goods under CTH 38231900 and allowed the appeal of the respondent.

As this order was not honoured, the respondent approached the Gujarat High Court and the High Court disposed of the petition by ordering the release of the goods subject to certain conditions but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the classification and suggested to the Department to request the Tribunal to give an early hearing in the matter of the appeal filed by them.

Theapplication seeking early hearing of the appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed by the Tribunal.

The respondent submitted that there is no argument advocated by the Revenue that imported goods need classification under CTH 1515 and Commissioner (Appeals) had only the option of deciding the classification of imported goods either under CTH 1513 or CTH 38231900, as per the show cause notice issued. Further, Revenue has not taken any ground in the appeal as to why classification decided by Commissioner (Appeals) under CTH 38231900 is not correct.

Inasmuch as it is the submission of the respondent that at this stage Revenue cannot go beyond the scope of SCN and contend that CTH 1515 is the correct classification of the imported goods.

The Bench observed –

“6. Heard both sides and perused the case records. The issue involved in the present appeal filed by the Revenue is whether classification of the imported goods Palm Kernal Acid Oil can now be made under CTH 1515 when the original contest was for classification of the imported goods under either CTH 38231900 or CTH 15132910 before the Adjudicating authority and the first appellate authority. The dispute taken before the first appellate authority by the importer (present respondent) was decided under CTH 38231900 after getting further testing of the sample of imported goods. Even after receipt of the subsequent test report, as per the directions of first appellate authority it was not agitated by the Revenue that classification of the imported goods could be other than CTH 38231900 or CTH 15132910. When an issue is not the subject matter of the show cause notice first issued and was not agitated before the lower authorities, it has to be held that Revenue has no justification in agitating an issue before this Bench which was not agitated before the lower authorities. Accordingly, the lower authorities cannot be directed to go beyond the scope of the show cause notice.”

Holding that there is no merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue, the same was rejected.

(See 2014-TIOL-1093-CESTAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.