News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
ST - Telecom Infrastructure Services are more appropriately classifiable under Business Support Service - demand under BAS is not sustainable: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JULY 31, 2014: FOLLOWING are the service tax demands confirmed against the appellant by the CCE, Thane-I and against which order the appellant is before the CESTAT.

Sr.No.

Description of service

Category of service

Demand raised

Demand dropped

Demand confirmed

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

Sale of Sim Cards

Telephone Services

14.004,262

-

14,004,262

2

International inbound roaming

Telephone Services

58,600,798

51,830,179

6,770,619

3

Inter Usage Charges (IUC)

Telephone Services

45,506,219

45,506,219

-

4

Passive Telecom Infra Services

Business Auxiliary Services

24,385,419

-

24,385,419

5

Credit Availed on Customs Cess

CENVAT Credit

52,410

-

52,410

6

Total

 

142,549,108

97,336,398

45,212,710

It is submitted that the applicant had already paid an amount of Rs.95,00,000/- in respect of International Inbound Roaming, Inter Usage Charges (IUC), Credit availed on Customs Cess. The contention is that in respect of Passive Telecom Infra Services, the applicants were charged under Business Auxiliary Services whereas the Tribunal in the case of B.S.N.L. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I held that the activity undertaken by the assessee, which is similar to the applicant, is taxable under the category of Business Support Service. Hence, the demand in respect of Passive Telecom Infra Services is not sustainable.

In respect of the main demand of Rs.1,40,04,262/- which is in respect of sale of SIM cards, the contention is that during the period in dispute there was confusion in the industry whether it is a supply of SIM cards or it is service; that they had already paid an amount of Rs.1,08,00,000/- towards State Sales Tax; that part of the demand is time barred and the demands in respect of normal period comes to approximately Rs.15,00,000/-.

The Revenue representative submitted that in respect of supply of SIM card the issue is settled by the Tribunal in the case of Bharati Tele-Ventures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C.Ex., Pune-III 2014-TIOL-492-CESTAT-MUM whereby Tribunal held that sale of SIM Cards are not sale of goods but services and service tax is leviable.

The Bench inter alia observed -

+ Passive Telecom Infrastructure Services is more appropriately classifiable under Business Support Service where the present demand is in the Business Auxiliary Service and applicants are paying appropriate service tax after the introduction of business support service w.e.f. 1.5.2006.

+ In this view of the matter, amount of Rs.95,00,000/- deposited is sufficient for hearing of the appeal against the demand of International Inbound Roaming, Inter Usage Charges, Passive Telecom Infra Services and Credit availed on Customs Cess.

+ In respect of Rs.1,40,04,262/- which is in respect of supply of SIM Card, the issue is settled by the Supreme Court in favour of the Revenue; that the sale of SIM Cards are not sale of goods but services and service tax is leviable on supply of SIM Cards.

Taking a prima facie view that there is no ground to waive pre-deposit in respect of the service tax demand confirmed in respect of the supply of SIM Cards, the Bench directed the applicant to deposit 50% of the amount and report compliance.

(See 2014-TIOL-1376-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.