News Update

Elected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDO
 
ST - Appellant providing services to Knowledge Corporation which provides IT Literacy Course to make learner IT literate - BAS services are exempt since they come within clause (d) of exemption Notification 14/2004: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 22, 2014: THE appellant is engaged in providing services to M/s Maharashtra Knowledge Corporation Ltd. (MKCL) in relation to -

a) Promotion or marketing of services provided by MKCL;

b) Services incidental or auxiliary to the activity of promotion or marketing such as evaluation or development of prospective customer or vendor, public relation services, management or supervision on service activity;

c) Sale of services of MKCL.

MKCL is providing Information Technology Literacy Course MS-CIT to make learner IT literate. These courses comprise of:-

++ Reading and understanding a highly illustrated book

++  E-learning based self-learning sessions

++ MKCL's E-learning revolution for All (ERA)

++ Providing hands-on practice sessions

++ Learning facilitation by certified professionals

++ Academic interactions, assessment and collaboration.

After investigation, a show cause notice was issued to the applicants demanding ST for services provided by them to MKCL under the category of Business Auxiliary Service.

While granting Stay, the CESTAT had observed -

"3. We have gone through the services rendered by the applicant to MKCL and the activity of MKCL. Prima facie the activity of MKCL is not in the nature of business. Therefore, the service rendered by the applicants prima facie does not fall under Business Auxiliary Service."

We reported the Stay order two years back as 2012-TIOL-1088-CESTAT-MUM.

Along with the demands involved in the aforesaid stay order, another demand had also joined the bandwagon by the time the appeals were heard, recently.

The total service tax demand thus involved was Rs.32,20,600/- for the period April 2005 to March 2012 along with penalties &interest.

The appellant after explaining the activities conducted by them submitted that the same are incidental or ancillary to the promotion of IT education in Maharashtra and, therefore, is exempt under Notification 14/2004-ST dated 10/09/2004 which provides exemption of 'business auxiliary services' in so far it relates to:-

(a) Procurement of goods or services, which are inputs for the client;

(b) Production of goods on behalf of the client;

(c) Provision of services on behalf of the client; or

(d) A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (a) to (c) above.

It is the contention of the appellant that the activity undertaken by them falls within clause (c) viz. provision of service on behalf of the client or alternatively it would fall under clause (d) viz. a service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (a) to (c).

The Revenue representative submitted that the activity undertaken is promotion of business of MKCL which is also evident from the contracts entered into and, therefore, the appellant is not eligible for the benefit of Notification 14/2004-ST as rightly held by the lower authorities.

The Bench observed:

++ Activities undertaken by the appellant would certainly come within clause (d) of the exemption Notification 14/2004-ST which is “a service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in clauses (a) to (c)” and clause (c) deals with provision of service on behalf of client.

++ It is a settled position in law, as explained in the case of Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. 2002-TIOL-234-SC-CX that there are two stages of interpreting an exemption Notification. In the first stage, whether the appellant falls within the exemption clause, strict interpretation is required to be made. Once the appellant falls within the scope of exemption, a liberal construction has to be adopted.

++ As the activity undertaken by the appellant is incidental or ancillary to the provision of service by the client, the appellant falls within the exemption; therefore a liberal interpretation has to be given and the various activities undertaken by the appellant would become eligible for the benefit of the exemption.

Holding that there is no merit in the orders of the lower authorities, the same were set aside and the appeals were allowed.

(See 2014-TIOL-1564-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.