News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
CENVAT - If any goods are transported through pipeline, if they are not solid, there is every chance of loss of quantity by way of evaporation - CENVAT credit cannot, therefore, be denied on quantity involved in transit loss: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 28, 2014: THE appellant is a manufacturer of petroleum products. They were receiving Lube Base Oil through pipeline. During the course of transportation of the goods, they have received less quantity varying from 0.01% to 0.72% as per the invoices.

Revenue is of the view that as the appellant has received less quantity as shown in the invoices, therefore, they are not entitled to take CENVAT Credit on the differential quantity.

The authorities below were not impressed by the arguments advanced by the assessee and, therefore, made him fall in line – inasmuch as the demands were confirmed along with interest and penalty.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant submitted that the Lube Base Oil being petroleum product is subject to evaporation or weighment difference due to temperature etc. and the transit loss of 1% is permissible as held by High Court of Bombay in their own case. Therefore, they are entitled for input credit as per the quantity shown in the invoices.

The Revenue representative submitted that in the case decided by the High Court the goods in question were ‘Naphtha' and being highly volatile in nature, transit loss can occur during transportation but in the case on hand, ‘Lube Base Oil' is not a volatile product. And, therefore, the demand is required to be confirmed.

The Bench observed –

"8. There is no doubt that the Lube Base Oil are being transported through pipeline. If any goods are transports through pipeline or by other means of transports, if they are not solid, there is every chance of loss of quantity of the goods by way of evaporation. Therefore, as held by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the appellant's own case (supra) transit loss can be allowed. I also find that in this case the transit loss is varying between 0.01% and 0.72% which is admissible in the facts and circumstances of the case. Therefore, I hold that there may be variation in the transportation of the quantity of the goods accordingly, transit loss is allowable. Hence I hold that the appellant is entitled for input credit as shown in the invoices…."

In fine, the order of the lower authority was set aside and the appeal and stay application were allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2014-TIOL-1616-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.