News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
CENVAT credit availed on Input Services used in or in relation to manufacturing activity at Pune factory has no nexus with rendering of output service of Renting of Immovable property in Mumbai: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, SEPT 19, 2014: THE applicant availed CENVAT credit of various input services such as legal services, CHA service, repair and maintenance service, manpower recruitment service, account and audit service which were used in relation to manufacturing activity undertaken at the Pune factory.

They had constructed an immovable property at Mumbai & which they rented out. Service Tax was being paid under the category of ‘Renting of Immovable Property Service' by utilizing the Input Service credit taken in respect of the service received in the Pune factory.

The CCE, Pune-I was not pleased with this concept of ‘borrowing' CENVAT credit for discharge of ST liability and, therefore, issued a SCN proposing to deny the utilisation of CENVAT credit and for recovery of the same.

In adjudication, the demand of Rs.54,44,777/- was confirmed and against this order the applicant is before the CESTAT seeking a stay on the recovery.

Both sides justified their stand.

The Bench observed -

++ It is a basic principle of CENVAT credit that there has to be a nexus between the input and input service and the output and output service. Only in respect of input and input service which goes into the manufacture of output or which are used in or in relation to rendering of output service, credit can be taken. This is what Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 stipulates.

++ If there is no nexus between the input and input service and the output or output service, credit cannot be taken or utilised. In the present case, it is not in dispute that the credit was earned in respect of input/input service which were used in or in relation to the manufacturing activity of the appellant. The same has no nexus with the rendering of the output service of renting of immovable property in Mumbai.

Holding that the applicant had not made out a prima facie case for waiver of dues as utilisation of the CENVAT credit for payment of service tax on ‘Renting of immovable property' at Mumbai is clearly not permissible in law, the Bench directed the applicant to make a pre-deposit of the entire amount of CENVAT credit of Rs.54,44,777/- wrongly taken and utilised and report compliance.

In passing: By the way, hope the ST authorities at Mumbai aware of this!

(See 2014-TIOL-1799-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.