News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
ST - There cannot be a ST levy on supply of goods - Prima facie view is that cost of goods supplied while rendering a repair service cannot be subjected to levy of ST - Pre deposit waived & stay granted: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, SEPT 26, 2014: PURSUANT the remand proceedings ordered by the CESTAT, the CCE, Raigad has passed the impugned order by which he has confirmed a service tax demand of Rs.13,75,68,767/- along with interest & penalties.

The appellants had entered into an agreement with the principal for repair of containers used for transportation of goods by sea. During the process of repair, they use raw materials and consumables and also labour for the repairs undertaken. On labour charges and consumables, they had discharged the service tax liability. On the raw materials used in the repair of the containers on which VAT/sales tax liability accrued, appellant did not discharge service tax liability on the ground that the said activity amounts to supply/deemed sale of the goods. It is their contention before the CESTAT in the second round of proceedings that they are eligible for abatement of the value of the goods supplied under Notification 12/2003-ST or 1/2006-ST. It is further submitted that supply of goods is not subject to levy of service tax as the same is constitutionally prohibited. Reliance is also placed on the decisions in Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. 2013-TIOL-1764-CESTAT-MAD-LB, G.D. Builders 2013-TIOL-908-HC-DEL-ST, Wipro GE Medical Systems P. Ltd. 2008-TIOL-631-CESTAT-BANG to submit that confirmation of service tax demand by including the value of the goods sold or deemed to have been sold is clearly unsustainable in law.

The AR relied on the apex court decision in Rainbow Colour Lab & Anr. 2002-TIOL-373-SC-CT and submitted that in the case of photography service it is held that there is no sale of goods involved and the entire consideration received would be liable to service tax. Therefore, in the present case also since the goods are consumed while rendering the service, they become part and parcel of the service rendered and, therefore, the demands are sustainable.

The Bench observed -

“5.1 As observed by us in our earlier order, the short question for consideration is whether the cost of goods supplied while rendering a service can be subjected to levy of service tax. The issue has been settled by the larger bench of the Tribunal in the case of Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (supra) which has considered all the relevant decisions and has come to the conclusion that there cannot be a service tax levy on supply of goods. Respectfully following the said decision in the present case also, we are of the prima facie view that the cost of goods supplied while rendering a repair service cannot be subjected to levy of service tax. Thus the appellant has made out a case for grant of stay.”

Resultantly, the CESTAT granted unconditional waiver of pre deposit of the adjudged dues and stayed the recovery.

(See 2014-TIOL-1854-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.