News Update

CBDT grants more breather for Trust to file audit reportPM Modi praises Haryana voters for clear majorityDada Saheb Phalke Award goes to Mithun ChakravortiCus - Adjudicating authority notified for Penta Gold caseOsama Bin Laden’s son asked to leave France over social mediaI-T - AO has no jurisdiction to consider claim made by assessee in revised return filed after time prescribed by Sec 139(5) for filing revised return had already expired: SCPM to visit Laos to attend ASEAN-India SummitKautilya Conclave 2024: Dr Jaishankar stressed on emergence of AI and its impactGST - Yatri Sathi App - Applicant, though qualifies the definition of being an e-commerce operator, does not satisfy the conditions of Section 9(5) of the Act for discharging tax liability by an electronic commerce operator: AARIIFT to open first overseas campus in DubaiGST - Purchases of second hand gold jewellery from individuals who are not registered under GST would not amount as supply of goods or supply of services and applicant is not liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis: AARNC-Congress Alliance to form Govt in J&K; BJP breaks taboo in HaryanaFood parks among areas for investments between India and UAE: GoyalCX - Penalty - Rule 26 - SCN and OIO have explained in detail about the nature of offence for which penalty is levied - No breach of any requirement for levy of penalty: HCAbu Dhabi Investment Authority commences operations in GIFT CityGST - KHOL is exempted - End use of the product at the end of the purchaser is not the concern of the assessee and cannot be the consideration for classifying the goods in question: HCSafari Retreats Judgement of Supreme Court: A Pyrrhic VictoryIndia’s RuPay card launched in MaldivesI-T- When the assessee has own funds and surplus is more than investments, then, the presumption is that own funds are used: ITATUS Court orders Google to welcome rival App storesUS to sell lightweight torpedoes worth USD 175 mn to IndiaLawyers, wife not to have access to Imran Khan over security concernsI-T- Re-assessment proceedings are rightly quashed where found to be based on change of opinion : ITATHurricane Milton turns into Category 5 storm
 
Distribution of Credit by an ISD

OCTOBER 29, 2014

By S Radhakrishnan, Advocate

INPUT SERVICE DISTRIBUTOR:

Input Service Distributor is defined in Rule 2(m) of CENVAT credit Rules, 2004 (CCR). As per the above rule, it means an office of the manufacturer of final products or provider of output service, which receives invoices towards purchase of input services. It takes the credit and in turn issues invoice for the purpose of distributing the credit of service tax paid to such manufacturer or provider.

Manner of distribution of credit:

Rule 7 of CCR provides the manner of distribution of credit. As per Rule 7, the distribution of credit is subject to the following conditions:

1.Credit distributed should not exceed the amount of service tax paid.

2. Credit of service tax attributable to service used by "one or more units exclusively engaged in the manufacture of exempted goods or providing exempted services" shall not be distributed.

3. Credit of service tax attributable to service used "wholly by a unit" shall be distributed only to that unit

4. Credit of service tax attributable to service used "by more than one unit" shall be distributed pro rata on the basis of the turnover of such units during the relevant period to the total turnover of all its units, which are operational in the current year, during the said relevant period

Unit:

Explanation 1 to Rule 7 defines "Unit". It includes the premises of a provider of output service and the premises of a manufacturer including the factory, whether registered or not.

Analysis of distribution of credit -Unit-wise:

Unit

7(b)

7(c)

7(d)

Rule

Service used -

by one or more units exclusively engaged in manufactured of exempted goods or providing of exempted services

Service used -

"wholly" by a unit

Service used -

by more than one unit

Unit 1 - Exempted goods + Exempted service

Technically, credit can be distributed as it is not exclusively engaged in the manufacture of exempted goods or exempted services. The word used is "or" and not "and". However, Unit cannot take the credit.

Credit can be distributed. The word used is "or" and not "and". However, Unit cannot take the credit.

Credit can be distributed as per formula. However, Unit cannot take the credit.

Unit 2 - Exempted goods + Taxable service

Credit can be distributed to this unit. However, it is not clear whether entire credit can be adjusted against the output service tax payable.

Credit can be distributed to this unit. However, it is not clear whether entire credit can be adjusted against the output service tax payable.

Credit can be distributed as per formula. However, it is not clear whether entire credit can be adjusted against the output service tax payable.

Unit 3 - Dutiable goods + Exempted service

Same as Unit 2

Same as Unit 2

Same as Unit 2

Unit 4 - Dutiable goods + Taxable Service

Credit can be distributed to this unit. But not clear whether credit has to be adjusted 50% for dutiable goods and 50% for taxable services or on pro rata based on turnover of Unit-4

Credit can be distributed to this unit. But not clear whether credit has to be adjusted 50% for dutiable goods and 50% for taxable services or on pro rata based on turnover of Unit-4

Credit can be distributed as per formula. But not clear whether credit has to be adjusted 50% for dutiable goods and 50% for taxable services or on pro rata based on turnover of Unit-4

Unit 5 - Only exempted goods

Credit cannot be distributed

Credit cannot be distributed

Credit can be distributed but Unit cannot take the credit.

Unit 6 - Only exempted service

Credit cannot be distributed

Credit cannot be distributed

Credit can be distributed but Unit cannot take the credit

Unit 7 - Only dutiable goods

Credit can be distributed

Credit can be distributed

Credit can be distributed

Unit 8 - Only taxable service

Same as Unit-7

Same as Unit-7

Same as Unit-7

From the above table, it can be seen that if a unit is exclusively engaged in the manufacture of exempted goods and/or exempted services OR dutiable goods and/or taxable services, as far as the distribution and availment of CENVAT credit is concerned, there may not be any difficulty. However, when a particular unit itself is engaged in the manufacture dutiable& exempted goods and/or providing taxable or exempted services, then there could be a problem with regard to the availment of input service tax credit distributed by ISD. The question is, in the absence of any rule, whether the unit would be justified in availing the entire credit distributed by ISD against the duty/service tax payable by the Unit. A conservative approach would be to not take a portion of the credit "attributable" to exempted goods or services manufactured/rendered by the Unit.

(DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Credit distributed by ISD

Unit 1: Cenvat credit cannot be distributed by ISD to units exclusively engaged in manufacture of exempted goods + provision of exempted services. The word “or” has not been used in Rule 7(b) in disjunctive sense and so, it includes “and”.

Unit 2, 3: Credit can be distributed by ISD and taken by Units. But, these Units have to follow provisions of Rule 6 of CCR,2004, as they are engaged in both types of activities, dutiable & exempted.

Unit 4: For units manufacturing dutiable goods and providing taxable service, there are no criteria that Cenvat credit distributed by the ISD has to be utilised 50% for goods and 50% for services or to be utilised pro rata based on turnover of goods and services. Credit rightly distributed by ISD and rightly taken by the Unit can be utilized in any proportion either towards payment of CE duty and/or towards payment of Service Tax. When credit distributed by ISD merged into Cenvat credit account of the Unit (which may have credits other than distributed by ISD), sometime it is not possible to workout ratio of utilization of credit distributed by ISD (i.e. ratio towards payment of CE duty and/or ST).

These are personal views.

Posted by Shvetal Parikh
 
Sub: CENVAT credit by units for ISD distribution

Thought provoking article and let me share following views

1.Rule 7 of CCR speaks about distribution of CENVAT credit taken by ISD. This rule itself does not allow CENVAT credit for units. For taking credit by units Rule 2(l) of CCR is applicable which requires nexus to qualify as input service.

2.Units manufacturing both excisable & exempted goods or rendering taxable & exempted services has to follow Rule 6 of CCR for ISD credit also. It is advisable to go for ISD rout only for common services used in multiple locations and which are not meant for exempted products at any of the units. Alternatively one can opt for payment of an amount equal to 6% of value of the exempted goods or services as required under Rule 6(3) (i) which will give relief from other cumbersome procedure given in other options of Rule 6. However this depends on economic viability based on quantum & value of the product.

3.Rule 7 of CCR has been amended effective Apr.2014 to distribute credit relaxing the nexus of actual usage of service by units without corresponding amendment in Rule 2(l) of CCR. Only distribution is taken care leaving CENVAT credit eligibility of units

Posted by
G.Mani

Posted by govindan_mani govindan_mani
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Fiscal Awards 2024.



Ms. Kavita Reddy reading the acceptance speech on behalf of Dr. Y. V. Reddy former Governor of RBI, at TOL Fiscal Awards 2024 after being conferred TOL Kautilya Global Award 2024 by Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha, Shri Harivansh Narayan Singh.