News Update

GST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN HqsCX - Clearance to sister concern for captive consumption - Department cannot compel assessee to perpetuate the illegality and in such circumstances the whole exercise was revenue neutral: HC75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCPM says NO to religion-based reservationCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Since the objective of Central Government in imposing ban with immediate effect was to avert a food crisis in the country, a strict compliance of exemption conditions would further the said intent of the Notification(s): HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesKiller floods - 228 killed in Kenya + 78 in BrazilI-T - Grant of registration u/s 12A can't be denied by invoking Sec 13(1)(b), as provisions of section 13 would be attracted only at time of assessment and not at time of grant of registration: ITATFlight cancellation case: Qantas accepts USD 66 mn penaltyI-T- Joint ownership in two residential properties at the time of sale of the original asset does not disentitle the assessee to claim of deduction under section 54F of the Act: ITATIsrael shuts down Al Jazeera; seizes broadcast equipmentIndia to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
ST - Contract for collection of proceeds from foreign buyer is between appellant and its Indian branch - Thus, both are situated in India and, therefore, there is no import of service involved - Stay granted: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, NOV 05, 2014: A service tax demand of Rs.14,69,439/- alongwith interest and penalties confirmed by the adjudicating authority was upheld by the Commissioner(A) and, therefore, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

The facts are that the appellant has a manufacturing unit of textile products and exported goods to the foreign buyer. The bills for collection of the export proceeds were handed over to Standard Chartered Bank at Fort, Mumbai. Standard Chartered Bank undertook collection of the export proceeds through their office in UK who retained a part of the amount towards collection charges.

The department is asking the appellant to pay service tax on the amount retained by the UK branch of the Standard Chartered Bank on reverse charge basis under Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994.

Before the CESTAT, in appeal against the confirmation of service tax demand, the appellant submitted that they have no transaction or no contract with Standard Chartered Bank at UK; that they had handed over the bills to Standard Chartered Bank at Mumbai and the said bank has discharged the liability on the commission charged by them; since both the service provider and the service recipient are situated in India, the question of demanding service tax from the appellant in respect of the commission retained by the Standard Chartered Bank in UK does not arise at all.

It is also submitted that for the subsequent period the department has accepted this contention and dropped the service tax demand.

The AR does not want to let go of this confirmed demand and reiterates what the lower authorities had held.

The Bench observed -

"7. We notice that the contract for collection is between the appellant and the Bombay branch of the Standard Chartered Bank. Thus both the service provider and service recipient are situated in India and therefore there is no import of service involved. How the Standard Chartered Bank in Mumbai makes arrangement for collection is not the business of the appellant, nor are they concerned with that. We, therefore, find that the appellant has made out a prima facie case for wavier of pre-deposit…."

In fine, the CESTAT granted unconditional waiver of pre-deposit of the adjudged dues & stayed the recovery.

(See 2014-TIOL-2177-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.