News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - Whether when assessee is under investigation, Revenue is legally right in collecting cheque payments towards future tax demand in order to protect its own interest - NO: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, NOV 07, 2014: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether when the assessee is under investigation, Revenue is legally right in collecting cheque payments towards future tax demand in order to protect its own interest. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case

The assessee is a trading company. The assessee filed the present petition on the ground that the Revenue without passing any assessment order and ordering a definite tax demand, had recovered three cheques totaling to Rs.3,08,50,688 from the assessee. The Counsel of the assessee urged the court to direct the Revenue to return the said cheques to the assessee. Whereas the Counsel of the Revenue submitted that the adjudication proceedings were already initiated and show-cause notices were also issued, thus to protect the interest of the Revenue, it had found on investigation that the assessees would be liable to pay the amount of Rs.3,08,50,688/- including the penalty. Therefore, in the larger public interest, the cheques were recovered. However, there was no final assessment order or provisional assessment order passed.

The HC held that,

++ it is required to be noted that the Department has recovered the cheques totaling to Rs.3,08,50,688/- from the assessees towards the future tax demand and/or liability of the assessees. However, it is required to be noted that as such the assessment proceedings are not completed and neither any provisional assessment order nor final assessment order has been passed against the assessee crystallizing the tax demand. The identical question came to be considered by the Division Bench of this Court and the Division Bench vide order dated 14.2.2014 passed in SCA No.959/2014, has quashed and set aside the action on the part of the Department collecting the cheques from the assessees without passing any final assessment order either provisional and/or final assessment order crystallizing the tax demand;

++ in view of the reasons stated above, the present petition succeeds in part and the action of the Department in collecting the cheques totalling to Rs.3,08,50,688/-, as mentioned in para-32(B) of the petition, without passing any final assessment order and/or without passing any provisional assessment order and without crystallizing the tax demand, is hereby quashed and set aside and the Department is hereby directed to return the aforesaid cheques to the assessees, forthwith. As the adjudication proceedings are already initiated, the same may be concluded in accordance with law and on merits. It will also be open for the Department to pass provisional assessment order, if permissible under the law. The amount of Rs.10 lacs deposited by the assessees pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, the Registry is directed to return the same to the assessees by way of A/c payee cheque, without prejudice to the rights of the department of the final assessment and/or provisional assessment.

(See 2014-TIOL-1910-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.