News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
CX - S.35A(3) of CEA, 1944 - Commissioner(A) could not have enhanced penalty without issuance of any show-cause notice - Matter remanded: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JAN 07, 2015: THIS is an appeal directed against an order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Pune-III on 29.10.2009 and concerns penalty.

Incidentally, in the earlier round of proceedings, the Tribunal had remanded the matter by an order dated 11.05.2009 and in remand proceedings, the first appellate authority has enhanced the penalty imposed on the appellant.

Interestingly, while passing that order of remand reported by us as - 2009-TIOL-904-CESTAT-MUM, the Bench had quipped - To any prudent man, ambiguity is writ large on above order of the learned Commissioner(Appeals). On the one hand, the appellate authority holds that the assessee is liable to be penalized under section 11AC. On the other hand, it holds that the assessee is not liable to pay penalty.

Be that as it may, before the CESTAT, in the current proceedings, the appellant submits that as per the provisions of section 35A of the CEA, 1944, the first appellate authority has to issue a show cause notice for enhancement of the penalty.

The Bench observed –

"4.…we find that the adjudicating authority has imposed penalty on the appellant under rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The first appellate authority has enhanced the penalty without issuing any show-cause notice to the appellant. We find that the first proviso to the provisions of section 35A(3) mandates for issuance of a show cause notice. In the absence of any such show cause notice, we are of the view that the impugned order is liable to be set aside. At the same time, since the appeal filed by the appellant against the order of the adjudicating authority needs to be decided, we remand the matter back to the first appellate authority to reconsider the issue afresh after following the principles of natural justice."

The order-in-appealwas set aside and the appeal was allowed by way of remand.

In passing : It's time that the NACEN schedules some training programmes for the senior officers too as part of its New Year resolution!

Six years and we are back to square 1.

(See 2015-TIOL-55-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.