News Update

Delhi IIT opens Abu Dhabi campus with first batch of 52 studentsKolkata rape case: RSS favours swift justice for women4 pax gunned down on Chicago train; Suspect nabbedHouthis continue to shell oil tankers in Red SeaVolkswagen mulling over closure of China factoryHarris to buy Biden’s stand on sale of US Steels to Japanese companyBrazilian SC’s larger bench upholds decision to suspend X nationwidePutin lands in Mongolia, signatory to ICC pactUS seizes aircraft used by Venezuelan President on sanctions groundCabinet approves 309 Km long new line between Mumbai and IndoreKGST - As is trite law, a suit filed prior has to be adjudicated so as to bar a suit filed subsequently & that doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable without a previous adjudication: HCCabinet approves seven major schemes for improving farmers' lives and livelihoodsGST - Adjournment was granted for two weeks but the proper officer passed the orders before the period was over - Orders set aside and matter remanded: HCCabinet approves one more semiconductor unit under ISMTurkey keen to join BRICS in effort to look beyond WestGST - Shipping bill can be considered as an application for refund of IGST in terms of rule 96: HCCabinet approves Digital Agriculture Mission with outlay of Rs. 2817 CroreCCPA imposes penalty of Rs 5 Lakh on Shankar IAS AcademyCBDT issues transfer order of 17 Addl / JCITsCBDT promotes 6 IRS officers as CCITThe making of an 'Input Service Distributor'CBIC amends Sea Cargo Manifest & Transshipment Regulations
 
Tax collectors masquerading as Tax-Adjudicators - Reforming Tax system

FEBRUARY 09, 2015

By Dr G Sreekumar Menon & Arjun Banerjee

INDIA's ambitious tax reform initiative, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is likely to be implemented from April 2016 onwards. The present taxation system is a mix of levies by both Centre and States, ranging from manufacture to sale, causing difficulty to trade and industry and the end consumers. Introduction of GST will open a new Chapter in Tax Reform by replacing the complex mix of central and state levies, such as Central Excise, Value added tax and octroi by a single unified tax, across the country. This is going to be an ambitious and path breaking tax reform, set to dramatically alter A to Z of Tax Collection. The integration of Central and State taxes will involve transforming Tax Administration itself, which is very essential, as in the present scheme of things, there is considerable tax-evasion, huge tax-amounts locked up in litigation for decades, and taxes not getting remitted to the Public Exchequer, resulting in huge tax-arrears. Despite these shortcomings the economy of India is eleventh largest economy in the world by nominal GDP and the fourth largest by Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). Economists predict that by 2020, India will be among the leading economies of the world, a worldwide survey by the German Bertelsmann Stiftung says that three-fourth of Indians see themselves as a super power in 2020. This can become a reality only if the current tax system and Tax Administration are subjected to substantial refinement.

The Government of the day, while, embarking on a major surgical exercise, of the tax system, has to design a world class Tax Administration also. Many Tax Reforms fail because of poor implementation and enforcement in addition to complex legal interpretation and biased adjudications of tax disputes. Compounding the ills of the bad design of these taxes are the weaknesses of the Tax Administration. Tax Administration Reform Commission (TARC) has observed - “the Indian Tax Administration is at its nadir. A fundamental and deep reform is urgently called for.” Without reforming the present Tax Administration, we can ill-afford to have a new Tax System being implemented. Reforming the Indian Tax System is vital if the Indian Economy wants to surge ahead into the league of super economies. However, the focus of the Government has been on redesigning the taxation structure by shifting to GST. Hardly any emphasis is there to change the tax regime. TARC has made a detailed study of the ills of the current Tax Administration and suggested several recommendations. The writers of this Article feel that before GST is implemented, the tax regime needs to be overhauled from A to Z, otherwise, it will have an adverse impact on GST implementation. An inefficient Tax Administration can jeopardize the entire GST Scheme. So the Tax Administration needs to be revamped and reformed and designed to implement the landmark reform of GST. How this can be achieved is the scope of this Article.

Present Tax Administration:

The current practice of blind fixation of revenue targets, unbridled pursuit of revenue targets, uncontrolled issue of Show Cause Notices, highly biased Adjudications and consequently huge pile-up of tax cases at all levels, has given the Indian Tax Administration a bad reputation in jurisdictions across the world. The state of Indian Tax Administration is also reflected in the World Bank Report on doing Business in India, 2015, which ranks India at a dismal 156 out of 189 countries in terms of ease of paying taxes. Investors are wary of entering into tax disputes that can take decades to resolve. Governments use the tax system for multiple social, economic, and political objectives, which create complexities in Tax Administration and this undermines the objective of fairness, and lead to misallocation of resources in the economy. Reforms are needed from time to time to flush out the undesirable elements of the tax system and restore efficiency, fairness and equity. What is the way out of this impasse and what is the guarantee that our Tax Administration will not enmesh GST into another legal quagmire?

GST Road Map:

Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Modi's vision for market-led growth will require the formation of a single Indian common market in which businesses can source anywhere, manufacture anywhere and sell anywhere. But India's current indirect tax System is a serious impediment to achieving this goal.

India's Complex and multi-layered tax structure (Central, State, local) not just makes it a difficult place to do business but makes it a high-cost place as well. The new Goods and Services Tax is rightly seeking to get rid of this 'one country, several markets' syndrome. The enormity of the potential economic opportunity of such transformation is well mapped out in the CII-KPMG Report (Vibrant India : Best Place of Doing Business - An Action Plan). The change in business environment can potentially create 25 million more jobs and Rs. 8 lakh Crore incremental GDP over five years.

The GST model, as we all know, will have CGST and SGST as two lines of taxes across the supply chain with credits across these lines of GST. In case of interstate sales or stock transfer, the proposed Integrated GST (IGST) model will be destination based and will see the elimination of the origin based Central Sales Tax (CST).

GST will affect all industries, irrespective of the sector. It will impact the entire value chain of operations, namely procurement, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, sales and pricing. It will also trigger the need to relook at internal organization and IT Systems.

All India Services Model:

The Constitution provides for the creation of All India Services (AIS) common for the Union and the States. The All India Services Act, 1951 provides that the Central Government may make rules for regulating the recruitment and the conditions of service of persons appointed to the All India Services.

Thus, the Central Government and the State Governments are going to actively collaborate and implement the GST. Where such integrations are in existence, the Government has the concept of an All India Service already in operation. The IAS, IPS and IFS are successfully performing models, where the Centre and States perform in harmony.

Why should the Government not make IRS into an All India Service? Clayton Christensen, a renowned professor at the Harvard Business School opines:“If you wait until the weather is so hot and then and only then do you plant a shade tree, it doesn't have much impact. You have to plant the shade tree long before it gets hot”.

His theory of disruptive innovation,for examples postulates that, our traditional ways of organizing defence is getting disrupted by terrorism. Our armed forces are not organized to deal with terrorism as a disruptive force. Similarly, our tax regime has been disrupted by the avalanche of Show Cause Notice being generated across the length and breadth of the country by Inspectors to Commissioners. The system was never designed to be a generator of Show Cause Notice to be self-adjudicated by legally ill trained an dill qualified adjudicators. Our Tax Adjudications have thus become a disruptive force, which we are not able to tackle.

The lack of timely disposal of high value commercial cases are taking a huge toll on the country's GDP. Almost 40 projects worth over Rs. 4 lakh crores are stuck in litigation process in different courts and tribunals in the country according to industry chamber ASSOCHAM.

The proposed GST should not get ambushed by our Tax-Adjudicators as it can spell doomsday for the Government. Hence implementation of GST will need advance planning, by way of reformation of the Tax Administration.

If we are serious of having a world class GST, then we need to set the Tax Infrastructure in proper shape and readiness. The new Tax System will be a turning point in fiscal federalism of our country. Continuation of the present mode of Tax Administration will not be a sagacious move. Adopt the All India Service pattern and then transform the Tax Administration to make GST a success.

The Central Board of Excise and Customs is the nodal national agency responsible for administering Customs, Central Excise, Service Tax and Narcotics in India. The Customs & Central Excise department was established in the year 1855 by the then British Governor General of India, to administer customs laws in India and collection of import duties/land revenue. It is one of the oldest government departments of India.

Currently, the Customs and Excise department comes under the Department of Revenue, Ministry of finance. The agency is staffed by IRS officers and assisted by subordinate officers of Group 'B' and 'C' cadres.

It cannot be denied that the present history of Central Excise and Customs taxation finds its roots in the history of revenue department of England. It was the English rule that introduced the organized system for collection of Central Excise and Customs revenue in India.

At present IAS, IPS, IFS Constitute All India Services. In 1948, the Imperial Police (IP) was replaced by the IPS. The modern IFS was established in 1966, after independence under the All India Services Act, 1951 for protection, Conservation and regeneration of forest resources. Thus any organized service can be brought under the All India Services Act, 1951. So the IRS(C&CE) may be incorporated into All India Services Act, 1951 for effective implementation of GST at Centre and State level.

The ills of the present Tax Administration are quite lengthy. While most State Governments have just one post of Sales Tax Commissioner with a Revenue Secretary and a Principal Revenue Secretary at the top of the hierarchy, the CBEC has multiple Commissionerates with top-heavy administrations in every State. The transfer policy has been a source of grouse for many officers. Resultantly, many posts are lying vacant, hampering work. By adopting the IAS/IPS/IFS pattern of All India Service, the Government of the day can bring a masterstroke and reform the Tax Administration.

Tax Adjudications need to be handled by a dedicated cadre of Tax-Adjudicators specialized in tax laws. The present system of tax collectors masquerading as Tax-Adjudicators has played havoc on the economy, on the trade and industry and on our courts. This triple assault needs to be effectively stopped, if GST and Make in India policy, needs to succeed.

Before the game begins,the pitch needs to be prepared and not vice versa .

(Dr. G. Sree kumar Menon is DG, NACEN, Faridabad & Arjun Banerjee is Assistant Commissioner, NACEN, Faridabad. Views expressed are personal and do not reflect the view of the Department in which the authors are employed.)

The writers gratefully acknowledge valuable inputs received from Shri. Naresh Penumaka, Additional Director General, NACEN Mumbai, and Shri. Samir Bajaj, Additional Director, NACEN Mumbai.

(DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: CBEC Cadre Restructuring and Tax Administration Reforms- moving in reverse direction

The article suggests a separate cadre of specialized Tax Adjudicators while TARC has recommended a separate vertical for dispute litigation. However, CBEC has moved in the opposite direction and has posted Commissioners for Adjudication in DRI and DGCEI itself. Adjudicator also reporting to DG. Probably to ensure that CBEC will get at least 7.5% predeposit in all cases booked by its investigating agencies.

Posted by
 
Sub: Good article

It is unbelievably honest and straightforward to come from the people who are still in service. Here the Tagore's words "Let me not bend before the insolent might" comes to the mind.

Posted by sureshbala sureshbala
 
Sub: masquerading as Tax-Adjudicators

Look at the order in originals- Order in Appeals and even the order by the technical members of CEGAT - They were equally or more perfect than the order by the judicial officers- They were not signing machines for the orders drafted by the Superintendents and others who were entrusted with the work to churn out an order in original- There were officials boasted of 1000 order in Appeal in a month or year also- An important subject is not discussed with required statistics and camouflaged to advocate for carrier gains. NACEN may obtain a solemn pledge that the probationers will not sign order in originals drafted by subordinates as adjudicating officers and will dictate the order and write down the submissions during personal hearings.

Posted by Jayaprakash Gopinathan
 
Sub: Tax Adjudicators

Well thought out and written article. Wanting to hear more on GST in future.

Posted by Lionel.

Posted by mangcus mangcus
 
Sub: tax admimmistrators

It is a shame. Now it is an open secret that OIO are prepared by the subordinates shame on you the blue eyed boys of CBEC. If the indirect taxation has to deliver , the different streams of work has to be entrusted to officials who will work in that stream throughout their career . Instead here transfers to different streams ensure total chaos instead of exposure to different streams . CBEC should cultivate expertise and efficiency and not mediocrity. The officers should do their work instead of depending on ghost writers.
If the indirect taxation has to improve at least 75% of the officers of and above the rank of Commmr sholud be allowed to go home with full salary so that the admn will become lean and trim and the organization will start tickling . Moreover higher level officers will have job satisfaction and will feel justified about their elevation in the hierarchy.

Now what meaningful work is entrusted at the rank of chief Commr

Every higher level post act as black holes in the system drawing resources wihtout any tangible outcome

Posted by harinarayanan thekkekalathil
 « More Discussions »

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube brings you an interview with former US Secretary of Treasury, Mr. Larry Summers who was recently in Delhi.



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.