News Update

Cabinet approves 309 Km long new line between Mumbai and IndoreKGST - As is trite law, a suit filed prior has to be adjudicated so as to bar a suit filed subsequently & that doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable without a previous adjudication: HCCabinet approves seven major schemes for improving farmers' lives and livelihoodsGST - Adjournment was granted for two weeks but the proper officer passed the orders before the period was over - Orders set aside and matter remanded: HCCabinet approves one more semiconductor unit under ISMTurkey keen to join BRICS in effort to look beyond WestGST - Shipping bill can be considered as an application for refund of IGST in terms of rule 96: HCCabinet approves Digital Agriculture Mission with outlay of Rs. 2817 CroreIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally down to 57.5 in AugustGST - Petitioner is permitted to pay amounts assessed in 24 equal monthly instalments together with interest - Recovery proceedings to be kept in abeyance: HCCCPA imposes penalty of Rs 5 Lakh on Shankar IAS AcademySC sets up Judge-headed panel to sort out protesting farmers’ grievancesGST - S.80 - Instalment facility granted to pay defaulted tax - If petitioner commits any default in payment of even a single instalment, it is open to respondents to proceed for recovery: HCPM to be on official tour to Singapore & Brunei between Sept 3 to 5GST - Allegation is that petitioner availed ITC in contravention of s.16 - Petitioner submits that they paid output tax without utilising ITC in question - Matter remanded: HCCBDT issues transfer order of 17 Addl / JCITsCBDT promotes 6 IRS officers as CCITThe making of an 'Input Service Distributor'President Murmu unwraps new Insignia and flag of Supreme Court of IndiaCBIC amends Sea Cargo Manifest & Transshipment Regulations‘Kavach’ system to be deployed in mission mode: Rail MantriMoS unveils New Single Unified Pension Form for Senior CitizensGST mop-up in August month rises to Rs 1.75 lakh crore
 
Excise duty on Non-Excisable Goods

MARCH 02, 2015

By R Subramanya, Advocate

RULE 6 Matrix is back!!. Notification 6/2015-CE(NT) dated 1-3-2015, has silently placed a provision by amending the Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, by including the non-excisable goods into its fold. The explanations inserted, explains

"4. In the said rules, in rule 6, in sub-rule (1), after the proviso, the following Explanations shall be inserted, namely: -

"Explanation 1. - For the purposes of this rule, exempted goods or final products as defined in clauses (d) and (h) of rule 2 shall include non-excisable goods cleared for a consideration from the factory.

Explanation 2. - Value of non-excisable goods for the purposes of this rule, shall be the invoice value and where such invoice value is not available, such value shall be determined by using reasonable means consistent with the principles of valuation contained in the Excise Act and the rules made thereunder.".

What is ‘non-excisable goods', nobody knows. It can only be presumed that Excisable goods means the goods which are covered under the central excise tariff, and what is not chargeable to excise duty is exempted goods, and anything other than excisable goods and exempted goods are non-excisable goods, and can fetch some value would be called ‘non-excisable goods'.

But, non-excisable goods can be anything under the sky. Therefore, anything cleared outside the factory for a consideration, would be required to reverse 6% of the value of such non-excisable goods!!

For eg. The following can be treated as non-excisable goods and the manufacturers may be required to reverse 6% on such goods.

1.   Any factory would have lot of junk lying in their factory, which for the purpose of cleaning if removed from the factory, would attract 6% reversal on the value of such un-wanted junk.

2.  Old and used office furniture, old vehicles, left over slag etc would also continue to attract 6% reversal.

3.  Factories which generate unwanted hazardous chemicals as waste, would also attract 6% reversal.

4.   Left out construction material, tools and tickles, which is auctioned for some value during cleaning of the factory, when removed would also attract 6% reversal.

In other words, there is no exemption in central excise if you are availing Cenvat credit. Either you pay duty, or if cleared as exempted or non-excisable goods, you need to pay by reversing 6% on value of such unwanted stuff.

This explanation is going to open a new Pandora box of fresh litigation, as to what will constitute ‘non-excisable goods sold for a consideration', for the purpose of Rule 6.

Well, it does not stop there. There is another explanation which talks about the valuation. It reads as,

"Explanation 2. - Value of non-excisable goods for the purposes of this rule, shall be the invoice value and where such invoice value is not available, such value shall be determined by using reasonable means consistent with the principles of valuation contained in the Excise Act and the rules made thereunder .".

The already under-staffed excise department is not even able to properly reach out to conduct audit of excisable goods at the regular taxpaying units, and if such an explanation is required to be followed by invoking valuation provisions on such non-excisable goods, this would have far reaching affect.

before parting ...

What can be the guidelines to whether any goods are non-excisable, and where to classify the same. What if some factory fails to reverse. Are we going to penalise or prosecute them. How can one decide whether the non-excisable goods being cleared from the factory are "the non-excisable goods for the purpose of Rule 6". Are we going to have another schedule of non-excisable goods in the tariff.

( DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: No Pandora Box

Rule 6 will apply only for exempted goods manfactured in the factory. This amendment has been made to get over the difficulty of not having any provision to demand reversal of credit for non excisable goods manfuactured and cleared. Please refer to Circular No 17/1/2012 Dt. 23.12.2013.

Natarajan

Posted by jaikumar seetharaman
 

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube brings you an interview with former US Secretary of Treasury, Mr. Larry Summers who was recently in Delhi.



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.