SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
Income tax - Whether advance tax liability can be adjusted against cash lying in account of Revenue which was seized from assessee during search and seizure operation - YES, rules High Court

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, MAR 19, 2015: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether advance tax liability can be adjusted against the cash lying in the account of the Revenue which was seized from the assessee during search and seizure operation. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case

A search and seizure operation was conducted at the residence and business premises of the assessee. The bank lockers were also searched. During the search, a sum of Rs. 4,31,36,000/- was found in cash and seized. The assessee wrote number of letters to all the authorities of department to adjust the cash seized against the advance tax for the AY 2010-11. However, the A.O. charged the interest u/s 234A, 234B & 234C of the Act. The said interest was deleted by the first appellate authority by observing that the cash was available with the department before filing the return and the same could have been adjusted against the demand of the advance tax. The Tribunal confirmed the same by observing that the cash belonged to the assessee and was already in the government account so there was no question to charge the interest. Still aggrieved, this petition has been filed by the Revenue.

Having heard the parties, the High Court held that,

++ it appears that, during the search, a huge cash was recovered. The assessee, while making statement under Section-134 of the Income Tax Act, offered to pay the tax on an undisclosed income of Rs. 10 Crore for which the tax would come to approve Rs. 3 Crore but the cash amount of Rs. 4,31,36,00/- was already available with the department which was deposited in the P.D. account. The assessee made a number of request from time to time for the adjustment of the cash seized against the liability of the advance tax, but the department neither replied nor adjusted the said amount. No doubt that before the due date, the cash was available with the department. The same could have been adjusted against the advance tax. The return was filed on or before the due date so the interest for default in furnishing the return of income under Section-234A was not desirable. Similarly, the interest for default in payment of advance tax is also not leviable under Section-234B for the reason that assessee had already made a request for adjustment of the amount against the advance tax which was already in the custody of the department. Similarly, Section- 234C is not attracted as there was no deferment.

++ in view of above discussion and by considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Tribunal.

(See 2015-TIOL-673-HC-ALL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.

TOP NEWS


AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST