News Update

US Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
Matter heard by Member (J), decision delivered by Member (T) - Order set aside and matter remanded with direction to hear and decide issue only by one person, either by Member(T) or Member(J): HC

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, AUG 10, 2015: A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner consequent to road patrolling by the departmental officers who suspected the invoice issued by the petitioner. Subsequent to production of documentary evidence, the Additional Commissioner dropped the proceedings, which was challenged before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) who confirmed the order passed by the authority. Revenue filed an appeal before the Tribunal.

The matter was listed for hearing on 06.09.2013 and the same was adjourned on 20.09.2013. On 20.09.2013, the same Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal heard both the sides and the matter was reserved for orders. The Petitioner subsequently received an order passed by Member (T) dismissing the appeal. The Petitioner challenge the same.

The Petitioner submitted that the matter was heard by the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal and the order was reserved. The Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal, instead of pronouncement of the order, had put an endorsement on the order sheet that the matter be re-listed on the board for certain clarifications. Instead of re-listing the mater on board of the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal, the same was listed before the Member (Technical) of the Tribunal, who had ultimately decided the matter in absence of the petitioner or his advocate.

After hearing both sides, the High Court held:

When the appeal was already heard and reserved for orders and the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal had directed the registry for re-listing the matter for the certain clarification, the registry ought to have re-listed the matter before the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal and not before the Member (Technical) of the Tribunal. The Member (Technical) of the Tribunal ought not to have proceeded with the matter in absence of the petitioner and ought not to have decided the same, which is contrary to the decisions of the Apex Court. The Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal was the best person to decide the matter only after getting some clarification, which he intended to get from the either party as he had put remarks on 25.10.2013.

The order impugned in the petition is required to be quashed and set aside. The matter is required to be remanded to the Tribunal for a fresh hearing and accordingly is remanded. It is clarified that the matter shall be heard and decided only by one person either by the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal or by Member (Technical) of the Tribunal in accordance with law.

(See 2015-TIOL-1797-HC-AHM-CX)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.