News Update

PLI scheme for electronics manufacturing sees incremental investment of Rs 8,390 CrG20 finance leaders agree to tax super-rich but forum not yet readyDPIIT promotes green logistics industry balancing economic growth and environmentIndia, US ink pact to stymie illegal trafficking of cultural propertyRailways expands tracks by 31,180 kmFroth in Yamuna river: Delhi complains to Centre against UP and HaryanaGovt to enhance reach of Indian Digital Public InfrastructureFormer BJP Minister says BJP has totally failed as Opposition in KarnatakaGovt provides incentives to small tea growersEU penalises 5 countries for infringing budget rulesI-T-Transaction involving transfer of unutilised shares cannot be deemed to be sale of shares so as to attract levy of Long Term Capital Gain u/s 112: ITATChina says Relations with Japan at critical stageST - Once the activity of appellant that is of forfeituring the amount of earnest money is not a declared service, question of retaining said money as consideration for rendering such service becomes absolutely redundant: CESTATEU medicines regulator disapproves Alzheimer’s new drugSC says no restrictions on voluntary name banners along Kanwar route eateriesFM favours debt reduction but sans affecting economic growthKargil Victory Day: PM warns Pak against practising terrorismChina pumps in subsidies worth USD 41 bn into car sectorMisc - Payments made to Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because statute provides for their recovery as arrears: SC CBMisc - Royalty not a tax; royalty is contractual consideration paid by mining lessee to lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights & liability to pay royalty arises out of contractual conditions of mining lease: SC CBMisc - Since power to tax mineral rights is provided for in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers in this subject matter: SC CBCus - Owner of goods has a liability to pay customs duty even after confiscated goods are redeemed on payment of fine - Interest follows: SC
 
Why no KYC norms for Participatory Notes?

OCTOBER 26, 2015

By Dr G Shreekumar Menon IRS (Rtd)

ALL of us are familiar with the arduous procedures involved in the opening of a simple savings bank account, ration card, mobile phone connection, LPG cylinder domestic connection and a host of other common necessities, wherein demands are made for identity proof, residence proof, and sometimes even secondary identification. In keeping with our unwritten national motto of "Harass the poor and pamper the rich", all such requirements stand waived for those having loads of cash, and a foreign location to deal in Participatory Notes. This is a term employed by Foreign Institutional Investors (FII's) through Offshore Derivative Instruments (ODI's) such as Participatory Notes, Equity-Linked Notes, Capped Return Notes, and Participatory Return Notes. In other words, the super-rich can hide under a cloak of invisibility, conceal their identity, or be a ghost investor, while the ordinary investor of this country will be badgered for all kinds of identity proofs. Simply put in other words, address-less funds are free to fish in our financial markets without any identification proof!

Look at the quantum of funds floating around unquestioned - SEBI has informed the Supreme Court that the outstanding value of ODI's or P-Notes at the end of February 2015 was a whopping Rs.2.715 lakh crores!

And where do these worthies come from? The Special Investigation Team (SIT) in its report to the Supreme Court has identified the top 5 sources of P-Notes as the Cayman Islands, U.S.A., U.K., Mauritius, and Bermuda. Major chunk of ODI's invested in India, about 31.31% i.e. approximately Rs.85, 006 crores, comes from the Cayman Islands!

What is the profile of this country called Cayman Island?

Legal Corner Icon

Its population is approximately around 55,000 (fifty five thousand) but they have invested a mind boggling Rs.85,000 crores in India! And none of our enforcement agencies have any idea as to who among this fifty five thousand population has invested Rs.85,000 crores in our country! Our politicians and enforcement agencies make a song and drama in the media about terror funding and terror financiers, but the stark reality is that our financial markets are an open playground for all kinds of anonymous entities. Terror financiers can safely exploit our legal provisions for anonymity to indulge in all kinds of nefarious activities. Who has designed such provisions? Who is responsible for rolling out the red carpet for anonymous investors?

I often speak about the secret coterie of Politicians & Bureaucrats having a tacit understanding to connive, contrive and sustain such shady arrangements. While the whole nation is kept busily engrossed by the media in meaningless charades of return of awards, and beating beef eaters, real issues get masked from public scrutiny. How it is that secret coteries of politicians and bureaucrats are able to formulate, implement, and successfully keep running such dubious investment rackets? At least, it is easy to identify the faceless bureaucrat who is manufacturing such dubious schemes.

There are three categories of bureaucrats in every Ministry/Department:

1) Frequent flyer: No nonsense bureaucrat, so routinely transferred as they are inconvenient to the powers that be.

2) Non-transferable: Bureaucrats who manage to stay for extended periods of time in strategic places like New Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, and Bangalore. Pliable and flexible, will participate in engineering any scheme as desired by the bosses.

3) The Untouchables: Bureaucrats who are invincible and cannot be dislodged, policy or no policy. These are the real manipulators, can twist and turn any policy, this way or that way. An apposite example would be the much-hyped "Public Servants Declaration of Assets" policy that has been repeatedly postponed for the third time in succession! What is the message being conveyed? Policy or no policy, we will decide whether to declare or not. Even the honest bureaucrat who wants to make a declaration is prevented from doing so. What is the message we are conveying to the fresh recruits in the bureaucracy? Why the Government can't permit the honest bureaucrat to declare his assets, those who desire to seek an extension can be granted permission, but it will be an eye opener. It can be safely assumed that the Untouchables (those who cannot be dislodged) are likely to seek extension.

Funds parked in Participatory Notes are in rich measure belonging to the Politician-bureaucrat cabal, who has designed these dubious schemes. A Cayman Island national would hardly seek anonymity in India, but an Indian residing in India, and routing funds through Cayman Islands needs anonymity as the funds are dubious. Funds generated as kickbacks, commissions, through money laundering and terror funds are those flowing into the country in the guise of Participatory Notes. The sleight of hand of the Politician-bureaucrat cabal is plainly evident.

(The author is Ex DG National Academy of Customs, Excise & Narcotics, Ex DG Multi-Disciplinary School of Economic Intelligence, Fellow James Martin Center for Non Proliferation Studies U.S.A.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: KYC Norms for PC

As usual an article, blunt and to the point. There is only one consolation that one day the rich and the poor have to die and be answerable to the Ultimate Administrator. Your Karma shall speak for you. Venkatesh Iyer

Posted by
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.