News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
Flexible Intermediate Bulk Containers (FIBC) are classifiable under CETH 63053200 - Not under CETH 39232990 as articles of plastics: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, DEC 07, 2015: REVENUE is in appeal before the CESTAT against the orders of Commissioner (Appeals). The Department issued show-cause notices to the respondents proposing to classify the goods FIBC under Chapter 3923 2990 as articles of plastics. The adjudicating authority in Order-in-Original classified the FIBC under Chapter 3923 2990. On appeal by the respondents, the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned orders allowed the appeals and classified the goods under Chapter 6305 3200 of CETH and set aside the adjudication order. Hence Revenue has preferred these appeals.

It is contended by revenue that Chapter Note 1 of Chapter 63 provides that the said Chapter applies only to made-up articles of any textile fabrics. This implies that only articles made up of textile fabrics are covered under Chapter 63 whereas FIBC is made from PP strips and classifiable under articles of plastics under Chapter 392090 / 39232990.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal held:

- The only issue in these appeals is whether FIBC is classifiable under Chapter 39232990 as contended by Revenue or under 63053200 as held by Commissioner (Appeals). There was no demand of any duty or dispute on rate of duty. The issue of classification of FIBC had arisen purely on account of export of FIBC and claiming export benefit of rebate / drawback.

- Board has issued clarification for the purpose of All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback and categorically clarified that classification of the product FIBC under drawback tariff item 6305. It is pertinent to state that both the drawback schedule and ITC Code issued by DGFT and CETH are aligned with HSN, the classification issued by the Board assumes vital importance and Revenue cannot change the classification under Central Excise Tariff Chapter 3923.

- Besides, the US International Trade Commission rulings dated 1.9.2011 for Tariff No. 6305 3200 10 for the classification of FIBC originated from Indonesia wherein the Commission has given ruling that FIBC is classifiable under 6305320010 of US (HTS). The HSN Explanatory Note of Chapter 39 clearly excludes FIBC of Heading 6305 from Chapter 3923. HSN Explanatory Note 6305 3200 specifically includes description of FIBC.

- Thus in view of the specific clarification of the Board and by following the Madras High Court's order in - 2015-TIOL-17-HC-MAD-CUS, it is held that FIBC is rightly classifiable under 63053200 and not under 39232990. There is no infirmity in the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the same is upheld.

(See 2015-TIOL-2591-CESTAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.