SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

Sun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN HqsCX - Clearance to sister concern for captive consumption - Department cannot compel assessee to perpetuate the illegality and in such circumstances the whole exercise was revenue neutral: HC75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCPM says NO to religion-based reservationCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Since the objective of Central Government in imposing ban with immediate effect was to avert a food crisis in the country, a strict compliance of exemption conditions would further the said intent of the Notification(s): HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesKiller floods - 228 killed in Kenya + 78 in BrazilI-T - Grant of registration u/s 12A can't be denied by invoking Sec 13(1)(b), as provisions of section 13 would be attracted only at time of assessment and not at time of grant of registration: ITATFlight cancellation case: Qantas accepts USD 66 mn penaltyI-T- Joint ownership in two residential properties at the time of sale of the original asset does not disentitle the assessee to claim of deduction under section 54F of the Act: ITATIsrael shuts down Al Jazeera; seizes broadcast equipmentIndia to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
IPRs - Whether editorial comments or case head notes developed by skilled professionals qualify as 'literary works' and therefore entitled to copyright protection - YES: HC

BY TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, DEC 08, 2015: THE issue is: Whether editorial comments/case head notes developed by qualified and skilled professionals qualify as 'literary works' and therefore entitled to copyright protection under the Copyright Act. YES is the answer.

Facts

The plaintiff is a leading publisher in the field of tax, corporate and commercial laws. The plaintiff uses on-line electronic medium for publishing and selling its publications. Since 2010, the plaintiff has been publishing case law reports (decisions with its head notes) on its website www.taxmann.com which is available to its paid subscribers. The Defendant is a company which owns the website www.casansaar.com. Towards the end of July, 2015 it came to the knowledge of the plaintiff that its editorial comments/ head notes (factual summary and case ratio given under the ‘Held’ section) had been fully copied by the defendant in large number of cases and these were available on its free website. A preliminary review by the plaintiff of the cases on defendant’s website was limited to the period 2013 - July, 2015 which confirmed wholesale and extensive identical/verbatim copying done by the defendant in about 1487 cases out of about 2800 cases (with citations) uploaded by it in the last 4 years. The plaintiff issued legal notice to the defendant which was returned undelivered with the remark ‘Party not accepted’. The plaintiff issued another legal notice to the defendant. However, the defendant failed to comply with the notice. Aggrieved plaintiff approached the High Court with the allegation of unfair competition and sought permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright (in editorial comments/ headnotes to cases) and for damages.

Decision

The High Court granted ad interim injunction and restrained the defendant from continuing with the infringement of plaintiff’s copyright in its editorial comments/case Head-notes. The Defendant was also directed to remove the existing infringing material from its website www.casansaar.com.

Reasoning

1. Editorial comments/case head notes are developed independently by qualified and skilled people consisting of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries and law graduates after expending considerable efforts and substantial expense and are proprietary material which qualify as original 'literary works' under Section 2(o) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and are entitled to copyright protection under Sections 13 and 14(a) of the Act. Hence, the exclusive right to use thereof vests in the person who developed it or the person who get it developed by professionals like plaintiff.No one else can use the same without proper authority or permission.

2. The Plaintiff provided examples of cases uploaded on its website and the defendent's website in this regard. Perusal of which showed that the head notes of the defendant were almost similar to that of the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff was able to make out a strong prima facie case for grant of ad interim injunction.

(See 2015-TIOL-2730-HC-DEL-MISC)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.

TOP NEWS

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST