News Update

ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersBiden says migration has been good for US economyUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockGST - April month collections go past Rs 2 lakh crore threshold - peak to Rs 2.1 lakh croreCX - Alleged clandestine removal - Not replying to SCN on the ground that letter is not furnished by department is only a ruse as reliance is not placed on the same by the respondent authority for adjudicating the SCNs: SCGST - Proper officer observes that the reply filed is not satisfactory and since the assessee has nothing more to say, demand is confirmed - Officer has not applied his mind - Matter remitted: HCGST - Petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of registration - Petitioner does not seek to continue his business and has sought cancellation of registration - Order modified accordingly: HCGST - Seizing the outward movement of funds from petitioner's bank account - Life of an order of provisional attachment u/s 83(2) is only one year - HDFC Bank, henceforth, cannot restrain operation of bank account: HCTax - on Death and ContemplationDelhi, Noida schools receive bomb threats; Children sent back homeI-T- Writ court is not required to interfere with assessment order, where assessee also has available option of statutory appeal: HCED seizes Rs 90 Cr stored in crypto in Gaming App scamI-T-Transfer of assessment is sustained, where assessee does not reply to any notice issued in this regard & where valid reasons exist for transferring assessment: HCHM appeals Naxalism will be erased in 2 yrs if Modi voted back to powerAmerica softens offence related to use of marijuanaI-T - Rule 11UA does not mentions pre-condition of approval of balance sheet by Annual General Meeting: ITATAfter US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyCBIC revises tariff value of gold, silver & edible oils
 
I-T - Whether provisions of Sec 14A cannot be invoked, when investments made were in sister concerns, or after such investments those companies became sister concerns - YES: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

 

CHENNAI, JAN 08, 2016: THE issue is - Whether provisions of Sec 14A cannot be invoked, when investments made were in sister concerns, or after such investments those companies became sister concerns. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case

The assessee is engaged in the business of providing logistics services and supply chain management. It had declared loss. During assessment, the AO held that given the volume and portfolio of investment, the assessee should have incurred expenditure in the form of managerial, administrative and monitoring nature. Therefore, made a disallowance u/s 14A relying on the CBDT circular No. 5 of 2014 dated 11- 02-2014 which had clarified that even when there was no exempt income earned during the year, section 14A can be invoked. On appeal, the DRP confirmed the same and held that as there was an increase in investment of more than 38 crores which clearly indicates that there was a direct nexus in increase in investment and borrowed capital and interest on borrowed capital charges to P&L A/c.

The Tribunal held that,

++ the main contention of the assessee is that the investments were made for acquiring control of other companies which are in the similar business of the assessee and all those companies subsequent to acquisition of the shares has become the sister concerns of the assessee. Moreover, the investments made were out of non-interest bearing funds of the assessee company. We find that these facts were not taken into consideration by the Revenue before invoking the provisions of Section.14A in the case of the assessee;

++ since the Revenue has not examined these facts, in the interest of justice, we hereby remit back the matter to the file of AO, in order to verify whether the investments made by the assessee company were in its sister concerns, or after such investments those companies have become the sister concerns of the assessee company by virtue of such investments, and further such investments were made from the non-interest bearing fund of the assessee company, and if found so, grant relief to the assessee in the light of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal mentioned herein above.

(See 2016-TIOL-49-ITAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.