News Update

FM reviews CAPEX of CPSEsGovt writes to over 2800 corporates to clear MSME duesGovt carrying out reforms in every sector of economy to prop up growth: PMIgnoring limitation proves costlyInverted duty structure - A Case study (See 'TOG Insight' in promotes four officers as Pr Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise + posts Sameer Pandey as DS in GST Council SecretariatSC cannot be a place for Govts to walk in when they choose, ignoring period of limitation prescribed - Petition dismissed as time barred; costs imposed on State for wasting judicial time - amount to be recovered from officers responsible: SCIs penalty compulsorily attracted on late payment of GST?No mutation of COVID-19 detected in India: Health MinisterCus - Goods re-imported for repair and re-exported - Merely because Assessee could claim duty drawback later on and it may give rise to a revenue neutral situation, it cannot be said that period of one year prescribed in 158/95-Cus is without any meaning: HCST - Payment of mobilization advance is a separate financial transaction within contract for providing of service & so is not to be included in gross taxable value as per Section 67 of Finance Act 1994 - duty demand cannot be raised thereon when there is no allegation of any part of contracted value having evaded taxation: CESTATBSVI introduction a revolutionary step: JavadekarCX - It is settled position in law that an assessee is entitled to interest on delayed disbursal of refund after three months from date of filing of refund claim till date of its realisation: CESTATCus - Drawback - After turning down request for taking test samples, Revenue cannot brush aside report given by an expert Committee simply for the reason that sample was not drawn and referred by Department: CESTATPayment made to a trust formed for the benefit of employees of the company, of which the assessee was a shareholder & whose shares the assessee had sold, does not qualify as expenditure incurred wholly in connection with transfer of asset: HCBogus purchases - only the profit element embedded therein is to be disallowed, rather than the entire quantum of purchases made: ITATSearch assessment is invalid where it is completed even before search operations are conducted or where any material incriminating the assessee has not yet been found: ITATWhere assessee did not claim exemption in respect of one residential property, the assessee can avail such benefit in respect of a second house or plot of land: ITATIndia successfully test-fires cruise missile from Indian Navy’s destroyer INS ChennaiCOVID-19: Global tally goes past FOUR Crore with 11.15 lakh deaths; America has close to 27 lakh active cases against 8 lakh in IndiaCOVID-19 - Almost 80% new cases coming from 10 StatesCountrywide S&T infrastructure facilities to be accessible to industry & startups: GovtPM calls for speedy access to vaccines once readyNew Zealand PM earns second term for managing COVID-19 wellDigital Media - Govt to extend all benefits available to othersGovt not considering any DA for Govt employees: GangwarCBDT issues transfer order of 395 Addl / JCITs on All India basisSBI given nod for sale of electoral bonds for 10 daysEducation CESS - the spoilt fruit
TIOL Effect - CBEC Corrects Exchange Rate Notification

DDT in Limca Book of Records - Third Time in a row

15 01 2016

DDT 2764 13 01 2016 reported about the Board's mess up of the exchange rates notification - Exchange Rates-CBEC Messes Up Notification-Hindi better than English.

Instead of substituting Sl. No. 12 in the notification, the Board had substituted Sl. No. 9. This resulted in there being no exchange rate for Norwegian Kroner as Sl. No. 9 is replaced by Sl. No. 12 - South African Rand. Rand will have two sets of exchange rates. Utter confusion for importers, exporters and Customs Officers.

We pointed this out on 13.1.2016 and we are happy to report that the Board has rectified the mistake by issuing a corrigendum the very next day. This is the speed of light by Government standards. Kudos to the Board.

CBEC Corrigendum in F. No. 468/01/2016-Cus.V., Dated January 14, 2016

Inspectors need not escort Joint Commissioners to their cabins - they know how to find way

IN the same DDT (DDT 2764 13 01 2016), we carried the story of the Vadodara Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise who directed the Control Room Duty Officers (Inspectors) to escort senior officers up to the rank of Joint Commissioners to their respective cabins.

DDT is happy to report that wisdom has dawned, though a little late and the Hon'ble Deputy Commissioner has issued another letter stating that the direction to escort is revoked with immediate effect, as per the directions of the Hon'ble Principal Commissioner.

So finally the senior officers can go from the gate to their cabins in the office all by themselves. It is not really difficult, if you try hard you can achieve the impossible, even go to your cabin without an inspector escorting you.

Kudos to the Deputy Commissioner also.


We are not able to get over the colonial feudalistic servility we thrust upon ourselves. The Deputy Commissioner acts on the directions of the Hon'ble Principal Commissioner. Now from which rank does an officer become honourable? Isn't an Inspector escorting an honourable Commissioner not honourable? Where does honour start from?

As Antony says in Julius Caesar,

Brutus is an honourable man
So are they all, all honourable men

And as the soothsayer says,

The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
But in ourselves, that we are underlings.

A judge fell down as he was climbing the steps to the court. A lawyer came running and asked, "Is your honour hurt?". "Stupid, it is not my honour that is hurt; it is my foot", said the honourable judge.

FAQ on Corporate Social Responsibility

THE Ministry of Corporate Affairs has issued FAQ on CSR - Corporate Social Responsibility. Some of the questions and answers:

1. Whether CSR provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 is applicable to all companies?

CSR provisions of the Companies Act 2013 is applicable to every company registered under the Companies Act 2013 and any other previous Companies law having

•  net worth of rupees five hundred crore or more, or
•  turnover of rupees one thousand crore or more or
•  a net profit of rupees five crore or more

during any financial year

2. Whether CSR expenditure of a company can be claimed as a business expenditure?

THE amount spent by a company towards CSR cannot be claimed as business expenditure. The Finance Act, 2014 provides that any expenditure incurred by an assessee on the activities relating to Corporate Social Responsibility referred to in section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall not be deemed to be an expenditure incurred by the assessee for the purposes of the business or profession.

3. What tax benefits can be availed under CSR?

No specific tax exemptions have been extended to CSR expenditure per se. The Finance Act, 2014 also clarifies that expenditure on CSR does not form part of business expenditure. While no specific tax exemption has been extended to expenditure incurred on CSR, spending on several activities like contributions to Prime Minister's Relief Fund, scientific research, rural development projects, skill development projects, agricultural extension projects, etc., which find place in Schedule VII, already enjoy exemptions under different sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

4. Which activities would not qualify as CSR?

- The CSR projects or programs or activities that benefit only the employees of the company and their families.

- One-off events such as marathons/awards/charitable contribution/advertisement/sponsorships of TV programmes etc.

- Expenses incurred by companies for the fulfillment of any other Act/ Statute of regulations (such as Labour Laws, Land Acquisition Act, 2013, Apprentice Act, 1961 etc.)

- Contribution of any amount directly or indirectly to any political party.

- Activities undertaken by the company in pursuance of its normal course of business.

- The project or programmes or activities undertaken outside India.

5. Whether display of CSR policy of a company on website of the company is mandatory or not?

As per section 135(4) the Board of Directors of the company shall, after taking into account the recommendations of CSR Committee, approve the CSR Policy for the company and disclose contents of such policy in its report and the same shall be displayed on the company's website, if any (refer Rule 8 & 9 of CSR Policy, Rules2014).

6. Whether reporting of CSR is mandatory in Board's Report?

The Board's Report of a company qualifying under section 135(1) pertaining to a financial year commencing on or after the 1st day of April, 2014 shall include an annual report on CSR containing particulars specified in Annexure.

7. What is the role of Government in monitoring implementation of CSR by companies under the provision of the Companies Act, 2013?

The main thrust and spirit of the law is not to monitor but to generate conducive environment for enabling the corporates to conduct themselves in a socially responsible manner, while contributing towards human development goals of the country. The existing legal provisions like mandatory disclosures, accountability of the CSR Committee and the Board, provisions for audit of the accounts of the company etc.,provide sufficient safeguards in this regard. Government has no role to play in monitoring implementation of CSR by companies

8. Can CSR funds be utilized to fund Government Scheme?

The objective of this provision is indeed to involve the corporates in discharging their social responsibility with their innovative ideas and management skills and with greater efficiency and better outcomes. Therefore, CSR should not be interpreted as a source of financing the resource gaps in Government Scheme. Use of corporate innovations and management skills in the delivery of 'public goods' is at the core of CSR implementation by the companies. In-principle, CSR fund of companies should not be used as a source of funding Government Schemes. CSR projects should have a larger multiplier effect than that under the Government schemes. However, under CSR provision of the Act and rules made thereunder, the Board of the eligible company is competent to take decision on supplementing any Government Scheme provided the scheme permits corporates participation and all provisions of Section 135 of the Act and rules thereunder are compiled by the company.

9. Whether involvement of employees of the company in CSR project/ programmes of a company can be monetized and accounted for under the head of 'CSR expenditure'?

Contribution and involvement of employees in CSR activities of the company will no doubt generate interest / pride in CSR work and promote transformation from Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as an obligation, to Socially Responsible Corporate (SRC) in all aspects of their functioning. Companies therefore, should be encouraged to involve their employees in CSR activities. However monetization of pro bono services of employees would not be counted towards CSR expenditure.

Ministry of Corporate Affairs General Circular No. 01/2016., Dated January 12, 2016

Customs - Imports from Myanmar - Exemption Notification withdrawn

NOTIFICATION No. 9/1995-Cus dated 6th March 1995 grants a concessional rate of duty for certain goods like rice, garlic… when imported into India from the Union of Myanmar.

The exemption is subject to the importer producing evidence to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs that such goods have, in fact, been produced in the Union of Myanmar and are imported into India through the land route from a notified land customs station.

The Government has rescinded the Notification.

Notification No.03/2016-Customs, Dated: January 11, 2016


The Prime Minister tweeted:

We join the Prime Minister in greeting all our esteemed Netizens.

Until Monday with more DDT

Have a nice weekend.

Mail your comments to

Sub: Escort

What is the use of a Control Room officer in a Central Excise or Service Tax formation? Even in a Customs Preventive formation, there is practically no use. who will take some steps to assess the out put of these officers? what are the Public Relations work done by the host of PROs? what public cause is served by them? why not keep some records for the daily activities by these people other than 'escorting'. how much money and manpower are wasted? Pitty that even the so called 'honest' are enjoying and allowing this to continue.Nobody takes the DC to task for issuing the order.