News Update

Indian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
Competition Act - Whether exclusive arrangement between Govt and Air India with respect to all air travelling purposes under LTC scheme amounts to anti-competitive practices - NO: CCI

BY TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, FEB 04, 2016: THE issue is: Whether the exclusive arrangement between Government of India and Air India with respect to all air travelling purposes under the Leave Travel Concession scheme amounts to anti-competitive practices. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case

The informant is an Individual. He was a consultant with different ministries to the Government of India. He filed complaint against Air India (OP 1), the Union of India and other airlines u/s 19(1)(a) of Act. The allegation was that Indian Government, through its policy directives/ office orders, force Government servants to avail the air travel services offered by Air India at a price which was much higher than those offered by its competitors in the market. The Government through its policy initiatives, ensure that OP 1 enjoys the benefits of having a captive customer base comprising of the government employees together with their dependants who undertake air travel under Leave Travel Concession ('LTC') Scheme, the government employees on official tour, and the private individuals traveling on government invitation. According to the Informant, support of the Union of India in the aforesaid manner had placed OP 1 in a dominant position, who engage itself in an unfair and discriminatory practice by charging a higher price for the tickets booked under LTC Scheme. The Informant further alleged that despite being conscious of the above said anti-competitive practices, other airlines remained silent because of the fear of a regulatory backlash from Union of India. It was alleged that compelling the government employees to avail the air travel services provided by OP 1 had been violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India.

Reasoning

Similar allegations had been examined by the Commission in the case of Travel Agents Association of India v. Balmer Lawries & Co. Ltd. & Anr., wherein the Commission held that the Government of India was the consumer of air ticketing services and a consumer is free to make a choice as far as selection of goods or services are concerned. Moreover, Ministries of Government of India are not an enterprise under the provisions of section 2(h) of the Act. Going by the same logic, the Commission in the present case held that Government of India is the consumer of air travel services as the tickets purchased under the LTC Scheme are funded by it. As a consumer of air travel services, it enjoys the liberty to exercise its choice even if such exercise of choice causes a favourable treatment for some Airline over the others.

Editor's Note: The reasoning of the Commission appears to be not very convincing and moreover with this order, there is one more addition after the IRCTC order to the list of orders when the Commission has ruled in favour of the Govt. The present practice of exclusive arrangement between Air India and the Govt of India under the Leave Travel Concession scheme certainly gives no option whatsoever to the Govt employees to choose any other airlines for their travel purposes.

(See 2016-TIOL-04-CCI-CACT)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.