News Update

CLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1NCGG commences Programme for officials of TanzaniaGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCDefence Secretary commends BRO for playing major role in country's securityGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCSC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCIndian Naval ships arrive at Singapore; to head towards South China SeaGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCIndia's MEDTECH industry holds immense potential: Dr Arunish ChawlaKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
I-T - Whether it is sine qua non for AO to charge interest u/s 234B in assessment order before he raises demand of same in notice issued u/s 156 – NO: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, FEB 24, 2016: THE issue is - Whether it is sine qua non for the Assessing Officer to charge interest u/s 234B in the assessment order before he raises demand of the same in the notice issued under section 156 of the Act. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case

The
assessee filed return declaring income which was subsequently revised. Assessing Officer finalized the assessment under section 143(3). CIT(A) partly allowed the said appeal and passed an order that so far as the charging of the interest under section 234B of the Act is concerned, the same is consequential and therefore, the Assessing Officer will recalculate the interest while giving effect to order passed by him. Assessee and revenue both preferred Appeals before the ITAT. ITAT held that as in the order of assessment the Assessing Officer had not charged any interest and therefore, no such interest is chargeable.

Having heard the parties, the Court held that,

++ levy of interest under section 234B of the Income Tax Act is held to be mandatory and automatic and at the rate prescribed and mentioned under section 234B of the Income Tax Act. The A.O. has no discretion to levy any interest other than right of interest mentioned in section 234B of the Income Tax Act. The A.O. has no jurisdiction and/or authority to reduce and/or charge interest less than provided under section 234B of the Act;

++ when levy of interest under section 234B of the Act is held to be mandatory and automatic, and the same is on the difference between the advance tax paid and assessed tax, A.O. has no discretion to levy any other interest other than provided under section 234B of the Act. Thereafter, levy of interest under section 234 of the Act would be consequential only and only arithmetically amount of interest is required to be calculated, even in absence of any direction by the A.O. while passing assessment order under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, there can be demand of levy and demand of interest under section 156 of the Income Tax Act. A.O. had no such discretion and moment he determines the "assessed tax" and on the eventuality as mentioned in section 234B, i.e. (i) an assessee who is liable to pay advance tax under section 208 has failed to pay such tax, or, where advance tax paid by such assessee under the provisions of section 210 is less than 90% of the "assessed tax", assessee shall, be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 1% for every month or part of a month comprised in the period from the first day of April next following such financial year to the date of determination of total income under sub-section (1) of section 143 and (ii) where regular assessment is made to the date of such regular assessment, on the amount equal to assessed tax, or, as the case may be, on the amount by which advance tax paid, as aforesaid, falls short of assessed tax;

++ it is not sine qua non for the Assessing Officer to mention / levy / charge interest under section 234B of the Income Tax Act in the assessment order before he consider / raises demand of the same in the notice issued under section 156 of the Act. It is also held that the Assessing Officer could charge / levy / interest as per section 234B of the Income Tax Act in the notice issued under section 156 of the Act directly.

(See 2016-TIOL-337-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.