News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
Customs - Whether Galaxy K Zoom Mobile Phone is to be classified under Tariff Heading 8517 as telephone or as camera under CTH 8525 - It is as telephone under 8517 - Rules AAR

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, FEB 24, 2016: GALAXY K Zoom phone proposed to be imported by the applicant is powered by Android Kit-Kat operating system and a quad 1.3GHz processor along with the dual-core 1.7GHz processor. It has a 4.8" HD SAMOLED (Pentile) touch screen. It comes with 2 GB RAM, 8GB in built memory, and has external memory of up-to 64GB. It has a support system for micro SD cards. Most of the specifications of the hardware and the software installed in the product, matches with the other mobile phones of the Galaxy series. However, one of the distinguishing features of this product from its predecessor in the Galaxy series is the quality of its camera. It is equipped with a 20.7MP BSI CMOS having 10x Zoom, w/Flash. Other important feature of the product is its In-Call feature. This allows the user of the product to capture and share an image even when on call, with a simple twist of zoom ring.

The questions on which advance ruling is sought by the applicant are as follows:-

(a) Whether the product is rightly classifiable as a telephone under Custom Tariff Heading (hereinafter referred to as "CTH") 8517 or as a Camera under CTH 8525?

(b) If the correct classification of the product is under CTH 8525, then whether the applicant is entitled to the benefit of the exemption provided under the Notification 25/2005?

The two competing Heads:

8517 Telephone sets, including telephones for cellular networks or for other wireless networks; other apparatus for the transmission or reception of voice, images or other data, including apparatus for communication in a wired or wireless network (such as local or wide area network) other than transmission or reception apparatus of heading 8443, 8525, 8527 or 8528.

8525 Transmission Apparatus for Radio - Broadcasting or television, whether or not incorporation reception apparatus or sound recording or reproducing apparatus; Television Cameras, Digital Cameras and Video Camera Recorders.

The AAR observed,

In view of above legal position, we are required to ascertain whether the product Galaxy K Zoom has the primary function and essential character of a mobile phone. It is noticed that the mobile phone is essentially a communication device working on the basis of towers and base stations arranged into a network of cells, which send and receive radio signals for cellular/mobile phone for communication. Further, such cellular/mobile phone will remain telephony. To classify the subject product as camera, on the basis that it has higher Megapixel of 20; optical zoom instead of digital zoom and has the capability to click picture and send them via multimedia message while on call, in our view is not correct, as such additions are related to the phone and not to the camera. It also may not be appropriate to shift classification of the product from the category of mobile phone to camera, on the basis of said 3 additional features i.e., higher megapixel, optical zoom and click picture and transmit the same while on call.

Further, Galaxy K Zoom is also classifiable as cellular/mobile phone as per trade parlance and consumer perception test. It is reiterated that the applicant advertises said product as smart phone. We also agree with the applicant that the product is sold and marketed in India as smart phone and not as camera.

We have to see whether Galaxy K Zoom is sold at phone shop/market or at camera shop/market. The answer is clear that such a product is sold at phone shop. Therefore, as per trade parlance and consumer perception test also, the product is mobile phone, classifiable under CTH 8517 12.

Ruling: The product i.e. Galaxy K Zoom is classifiable as telephone under Customs Tariff Heading 8517. Second question i.e., if the correct classification of the product is under CTH 8525, then whether applicant is entitled to the benefit of the exemption provided under Notification No. 25/2005, becomes infructuous.

(See 2016-TIOL-07-ARA-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.