News Update

Requisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termGST - SCN does not put the petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively, therefore, petitioner did not have any opportunity to object to the same - Order modified: HCUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedGST - A taxpayer's registration can be cancelled with retrospective effect only where such consequences are intended and are warranted: HCZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to EuropeGST - Rule 86A - Single Judge was correct in relegating appellant to his alternate remedy of replying to SCNs and getting matter adjudicated by adjudicating authority: HC20 army men killed in blasts at army base in CambodiaST -Simultaneous filing of refund applications by service provider/KSFE and the service recipients/petitioners for same amount - Applications ought not to be rejected on technical issue when applications filed in time: HC3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsCX - Department ought not to have waited for rebate proceedings to get finalized and ought to have issued SCN within normal period: CESTATGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeCus - As Section 149 prior to its amendment, does not prescribe any time limit, the Board vide Circular 36/2010 cannot impose a time limit so as to decline the request for amendment of shipping bill: CESTAT
 
CX - CENVAT denied on ground that ingots of thickness of more than 3 inches cannot be used for manufacture of MS Bars of 6mm - SCN relied solely on certificate of Technical Expert given upon inspection of rollers and dies at another Mill - same cannot be applied to appellant: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, APRIL 08, 2016: M/s Salasar Steel Industries were using MS Ingots and billets of thickness more than 3 inches for manufacture of MS Bars of 6 mm. On the basis of a technical opinion given by Mrs. Keerti Deshpande, Chartered Engineer of M/s Amod Consultants in the case of another party, it was alleged that the ingots and billets of thickness more than 3 inches cannot be used for manufacture of MS Bars of 6 mm.

On this ground, the demand for recovery of CENVAT Credit of Rs.26,64,744/- allegedly taken wrongly on ingots/billets of thickness more than 3 inches was issued.

The original authority confirmed the demand but the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demand by observing thus:

"The plethora of rulings given by various judicial authorities on Modvat&CENVAT Credit indicate that there are three criteria on the basis of which admissibility of CENVAT Credit is decided viz. inputs should be duty paid, inputs should be received in the factory or inputs were not used for manufacture of final products to disallow CENVAT Credit. The department has not brought any such proof on the record. Moreover, the possibility of carrying out the manufacturing activity in any other premises has also not been ruled out by the investigations….Therefore, I hold that the Department could not make out a case for disallowance of CENVAT Credit in this case. In view of the above, discussions, I find that the credit availed by the appellant on Ingots having thickness of more than 3 inches cannot be disallowed and the Order-in-Original dated 28.1.2011 passed by the respondent needs to be set aside."

Aggrieved with this order, Revenue took the matter in appeal before the CESTAT.

The respondent assessee was absent during the hearing.

The AR reiterated the grounds of appeal.

The Bench observed thus -

"4. …It is seen that the show-cause notice relied solely on the certificate of the Technical Expert which was given in a different case. The said certificate reads as under:-

"From the inspection of rollers and dies at the said premises and the observations-Ingots with size more than 2.5" (which is the disputed size) thickness cannot be used in the mill as raw material, because the size of first roller is such that, it gives output of a dimension 1.00" to 1.25" and the maximum size of input material 1.5" to 2.25" dimension."

The report of the Chartered Engineer is very specific and has been given after examining the machines installed in that Mill. The same cannot be applied in any circumstances to M/s Salasar Steel Industries without giving actual comparison of the machines installed and without bringing the said expert to M/s Salasar Steel Industries.

5. As regards the purchase register and the change in stand of M/s Salasar Steel Industries, these facts are irrelevant as none of these have been alleged in the show-cause notice."

In fine, the Revenue appeal was dismissed.

(See 2016-TIOL-839-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.