News Update

US Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
Customs - Refund of Additional duty of Customs (SAD) - Commissioner (Appeals) has followed a novel way to deny refund to appellant on extraneous ground not known to law - Copy marked to Chairman CBEC to remove bottlenecks in refund : CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, MAY 10, 2016: THOUGH the facts of the case are not very clear from the order of the Tribunal, it seems to be a case of refund of Additional duty of customs under Notification No 102/2007 Customs dated 14.09.2007 which allows refund of SAD on the goods imported and subsequently sold on payment of VAT/Sales Tax.

The importer is before the Tribunal against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) denying the refund.

The Tribunal observed:

•  It is surprising how the Commissioner (Appeals) has followed a novel way to deny the refund to the appellant on extraneous ground not known to law. He expected board resolution is to be filed by appellant for his scrutiny to grant refund of additional duty of customs (ADC). There is no such law so far been enacted requiring board resolution to be filed for examination by Commissioner (Appeals) to consider grant refund of ADC. Added to this, his observation is that Chartered Accountants appointment letter was not furnished. This is also surprising condition which has been misconceived by the Commissioner (Appeals). Thus it appears that he has a clear mind to deprive the appellant from zone of consideration under law. Such misconception of the authority became embargo against appellant and was detriment to the process of justice. A statutory authority should not create his own jurisdiction without that being conferred by law. Therefore, the matter is remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) to readjudicate the matter.

•  The authority is a creature of the statute to carry out the object thereof. He is expected to make the verification of the claim from grass root materials in accordance with law without simply acting on the basis of Chartered Accountants certificate. If he simply relies on third party evidence without carrying out his duty under law, there will be only empty formality followed to act in excess of exercise of the power which is not conferred on him. Therefore, the authority should act only within the parameters of law and carry out the object of the statute without any extraneous conditions imposed by him. Public confidence on law and statutory authority should not be shaken.

•  A copy of the order may be marked to Chairman, CBE&C to simplify the procedure of refund and remove the bottlenecks in the system of grant of refund of additional duty of customs, issuing appropriate guideline in that regard so that respect to law by the subordinates grow.

(See 2016-TIOL-1111-CESTAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.