News Update

Elected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDO
 
Customs - LCD Panels are classifiable under CTH 90138010 as claimed by importer, but not under 85299090 as claimed by revenue: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, MAY 27, 2016: THE Appellant company is engaged in the manufacture of computer monitor and registered with the Central Excise Department for manufacturing computer monitor. The Appellant imports LCD (Liquid Crystal Devices) Panels and classified under Tariff item 90138010 of the Customs Tariff Act. The appellant also claimed the benefit of BCD exemption under Sl.no.29 of Notification no.24/2005-Cus. However, the assessing officer was of the view that the LCD Panels were more appropriately classifiable under Tariff item 85299090 and not under Tariff item 90138010. There was no revenue implication as the goods classifiable under CTH 85299090 were eligible for benefits of BCD exemption vide sl.no.18 of the same Notification no.24/2005-cus.

The appellant contended that goods which are classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 8529 9090 are eligible for exemption from BCD under Sl.No. 18 of Notification 24/2005; that the goods are correctly classifiable under CTH 9013 8010 as liquid crystal devices which are subject to Nil rate of basic customs duty; that for disputes regarding classification, resort must be made to the general interpretative rules (GIR), in sequential order.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal held:

+ The issue is no more res integra and is covered by the decision passed by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal vide Final Order Nos. 52760 to 52780/2015 dated 10.6.2015 - 2015-TIOL-2277-CESTAT-DEL, in the appellants own case wherein the issue involved was identical and as to whether the classification of Imported LCD under chapter heading 9013 8010 vis-a-vis 8529 9090.

+ Apart from the Tribunal ruling, HSN has described LCD and from the fact that the wordings contained in CTH 9013 8010 are different from other entries dealing with LCD Technology. Tariff Heading 9013 covers LCD not constituting Article provided for more specifically in other headings. Explanatory Notes to the Heading 9013 also provide similarly and the panel under dispute are not described more specifically in any other heading. Therefore, the specific mention of LCD in Tariff Item 9013 8010 is more specific. This view is fortified in view of the exclusion of the Heading 9013 which would apply only to Articles which are more specifically provided for in other headings in the form of specific entries. It is therefore held that the LCD panel in the condition in which it is imported, are more specifically covered under 9013.

(See 2016-TIOL-1260-CESTAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.