News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
I-T - Whether claim of deduction u/s 80IB(10) is to be restricted to amount of gross total income prescribed u/s 80B(5) - YES: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 21, 2016: THE issue is - Whether the claim of deduction under Sec 80IB(10) is to be restricted to the amount of gross total income prescribed u/s 80B(5). YES is the answer.

Facts of the case

Assessee is engaged in the business of construction and property development. In assessment u/s 143(3) income was determined at Rs. 10.59 crores including relief claimed u/s 80IB(10) of Rs. 71.99 crores. AO issued notice u/s 148 and reassessed the income restricting the relief u/s 80IB(10) of Rs. 68.18 crores.

The stand of AO is that the claim of deduction u/s 80IB(10) is to be restricted to the extent of income under the head 'business or profession', whereas as per the assessee the claim of deduction u/s 80IB(10) is allowable to the extent of gross total income. CIT (A) allowed the appeal of assessee observing that the provisions of section 80IB(10) do not place any such restriction and the deduction allowable cannot be limited to the income assessable under the head 'business orprofession'.

Revenue contended that the deduction allowable under section 80IB(10) of the Act is with respect to the business income and not against the income assessable under the other heads. Profit from the housing project was to the extent of Rs.68.18 crores. Section 80IB(10) was relating to the business of development of the housing project and thus deduction was allowable to the extent of business income and not gross total income of an assessee, which may include incomes other than the business income also.

After hearing both the parties, the ITAT held that,

++ sec. 80IB of the Act prescribes for deduction in respect of profits and gains from certain industrial undertaking in order to compute the total income of an assessee. Sub-section (1) of Sec. 80IB prescribes that where the gross total income of an assessee includes any profits and gains derived from any business referred to in the sub-sections prescribed therein, the assessee shall be allowed in computing total income a deduction from such profits and gains in the manner as may be prescribed. The sub-section relevant for our purpose is sub-section (10) of Sec. 80IB which prescribes for deduction in case of an undertaking developing and building housing projects;

++ what is relevant to decide the controversy is the scheme in which the deductions prescribed in Chapter VI-A of the Act are allowable. For that matter, sub-section (1) of Sec. 80A prescribes that in computing the total income there shall be allowed from the gross total income, deductions specified in Sec. 80C to 80U of the Act subject to the conditions prescribed therein. The claim of the assessee is u/s 80IB(10) which is also liable to be governed by the prescription of Sec. 80A(1) of the Act. Sub-section (2) of Sec. 80A further prescribes that the aggregate amount of deductions under Chapter VI-A shall not, in any case, exceed the gross total income of the assessee. Furthermore, the 'gross total income' has also been defined in Chapter VI-A by way of Sec. 80B(5) to mean the total income computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act before making any deductions under Chapter VI-A. The aforesaid clearly implies that in order to deduce the amount of deduction entitled to the assessee u/s 80IB(10) of the Act, the starting point is the determination of the gross total income. Along with it, the eligible amount of deductions under various sections of Chapter VI-A are to be individually computed and such aggregate of deductions is liable to be restricted to the amount of gross total income prescribed in Sec. 80B(5) of the Act;

++ no doubt, the profits derived from the eligible business, which in the present case is the development and building of a housing project, is relevant to compute the amount of deduction, so however, its allowability has to be reckoned in the context of the availability of gross total income of the assessee. Considered in this light, in our view, CIT(Appeals) has made no mistake in coming to conclude that the claim u/s 80IB(10) of the Act is to be allowed to the extent of gross total income as claimed by the assessee and not to be restricted to the extent of income from business orprofession.

(See 2016-TIOL-1105-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.