News Update

Misc - Royalty not a tax; royalty is contractual consideration paid by mining lessee to lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights & liability to pay royalty arises out of contractual conditions of mining lease: SC CBMisc - Payments made to Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because statute provides for their recovery as arrears: SC CBMisc - Since power to tax mineral rights is provided for in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers in this subject matter: SC CBCus - Owner of goods has a liability to pay customs duty even after confiscated goods are redeemed on payment of fine - Interest follows: SCI-T- Demand notice issued mechanically merits being quashed, where passed in ignorance of assessment order giving clean chit to assessee: HCIndia discovers Lithium Resources in Mandya and Yadgiri districts of KarnatakaI-T- No disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) can be made if funds are available with the assessee, which are sufficient to meet the investment: ITATIndia's installed Nuclear Power Capacity to triple by 2031-32: MoSI-T- Penalty rightly quashed where assessment order proposing penalty is itself quashed: ITATGoyal sets USD 50 bn target for footwear industry to achieve by 2030I-T- Where public trust claims deduction under Chapter VIA & due to absence of separate provision in ITR for Section 80GGA at time of filing it, then claim being clubbed u/s 80G is valid: ITATIndian-origin German citizen nabbed with 6 kg of cocaine at IGI AirportIndia to remain steadfast in commitment to nurturing adolescents' talents: Health SecyAI-based SearchGPT to compete with Google: OpenAII-T- Assessee's acceptance of the cash in the form of SBNs, assessee being an Urban Cooperative Bank, which is not being covered by the RBI Circular, cannot be considered as unexplained for addition U/s. 68 of the Act: ITATDelhi liquor scam: United Spirits CEO summonedVAT - burden of proof lies with Department to verify & approve refunds to ultimate taxpayers: HCBiden to attend QUAD meeting to be held in New Delhi this yearST - Appellant is entitled to avail CENVAT Credit on re-insurance of motor vehicles and credit availed by it during relevant period from April, 2011 to March, 2012 on this score were all admissible credit: CESTATChinese youth furious over appeal to raise retirement ageST - As there is no positive act established against appellant with regard to suppression of facts, the period being transitional period, invocation of extended period was set aside: CESTATUS & allies allege North Korean hackers of stealing military secretsCus - Assessee-company is not liable to pay interest on deferential Customs duty arising out of the final assessment of bills of entry: CESTATMexican drug lords arrested in USCX - Cenvat credit of input services as per Rule 6(5) of CCR 2004, is allowed, even if such services are partly used for exempted businesses: CESTATNew Income tax Code to be developed internally by CBDT, says Revenue SecretaryCus - Department has not established any positive act on the part of appellant in regard to suppression of facts with intent to evade Customs duty, no grounds found for invocation of extended period, demand of CVD along with interest and imposition of penalties cannot sustain: CESTATKejriwal to remain in judicial custody till Aug 8CX - Refund of pre-deposit is governed by Section 35FF of Central Excise Act, 1944 and rate of interest is governed by statutory provisions and notifications issued in this regard, appellants are entitled for payment of interest as per provisions of Section 35FF and at the rate prescribed therein: CESTAT
 
Digital Signature Vs Facsimile Signature

JULY 18, 2016

By Arvind Gupta

IT is observed that so called big companies/Tax Consulting firms/MNC are issuing invoices by simply putting "Facsimile Signature” or with the remark on the invoice as "Computer Generated Invoice, No Signature Required" especially in Service Tax.

The notifications provide option for issuance of digitally signed invoices and maintenance of digital records. The mechanism for implementation of the provision was introduced via Notification No. 18/2015–CE(NT), dated 6 th July 2015 which gave effect to both Notification 5/2015-S.T, dated 1-3-2015 and Notification 18/2015-C.E.(N.T) dated 6-7-2015 detailing the conditions and procedures for issuance, preservation and authentication of the invoices and records in electronic form.

Any assessee who opts to maintain digital records and issue invoices is required to adhere to conditions provided in Notification 18. For instance, the digital certificate linked to the signature proposed to be used by the assessee has to be issued by the Certifying Authority of India. [The Certifying Authority of India shall mean to be the authorities registered with the Controller of Certifying Authorities. (Examples of such certifying authorities are Safescrypt, National Informatics Centre, emudhra, TCS, (n)code solutions, CDAC, GNFC, IDRBT & Capricorn)

In order to have further clarity, another Board Instruction F. No. 224/44/2014-CX.6 was also issued on 6th July 2015 enlisting the detailed procedure for usage, verification and controls for the usage of digital signatures.

The details of the said instructions and its practical applicability is as explained below:

++ Every assessee proposing to use digital signature shall use Class 2 or Class 3 Digital Signature Certificate duly issued by the Certifying Authority in India.

++ Every assessee proposing to use digital signatures shall intimate the details such as name, e-mail id, office address and designation of the person authorized to use the digital signature certificate, name of the Certifying Authority, date of issue of Digital Certificate and validity of the digital signature etc., to the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise at least 15 days in advance.

++ Every assessee opting to maintain records in electronic form, who has more than one factory or service tax registration, shall maintain separate electronic records for each factory or each service tax registration.

++ A Central Excise Officer, during an enquiry, investigation or audit, in accordance with the provisions of section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and as made applicable to Service Tax as per the provisions contained in section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, may direct an assessee to furnish printouts of the records in electronic form and invoices and may resume printouts of such records and invoices after verifying the correctness of the same in electronic format; and after the print outs of such records in electronic form have been signed by the assessee or any other person authorised by the assessee in this regard, if so requested by such Central Excise Officer.

But, as mentioned, many companies are simply putting facsimile signature or simply printing "Computer generated invoice- No Signature required" as a measure of simplicity and flexibility.

It is a bonafide belief that Companies of higher repute will not commit any error, but it is not always true.

There is huge GAP in understanding that all electronic signatures, i.e., e-signatures as for instance, facsimile signature and digital signature are one and the same. E-Signature is any signature that is in electronic form as opposed to paper-based ink signatures.

Examples of electronic signatures are scanned image/JPG image of the person's ink signature, a mouse squiggle on a screen or a hand-signature created on a tablet using one's finger or stylus, a biometric hand-signature signed on a specialist signing hardware device etc.

Most commonly used method (mistake!!!) of signature is facsimile signature which is a simple reproduction of one's manual signature saved electronically or by engraving, imprinting or stamping.

Suggestion -

A stringent instruction in continuation to the instruction of July 6, 2015 should be issued mandating the trade to put only valid digital signature (if they really want to move ahead towards Digital India) to avoid unpleasant moments as Section 77 (1) e & (2) of the Finance Act, 1994 bestows powers on Dept to impose penalty upto Rs 10,000 for non-issuance of Invoice in accordance with the provisions or any contraventions contained in the Act and Rules. Similar penalty also awaits under rule 27 of the CER, 2002.

And at the same time credit availed on defective documents is also a financial burden on receiver.

(The author is General Manager-Indirect Taxation, Sanghi Industries Ltd.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Digital Signature

Please refer to the article in TIOL dated 20th July,2015
http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/inside2.php3?filename=bnews_detail.php3&newsid=24154

Posted by james pg
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.