News Update

India, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN HqsCX - Clearance to sister concern for captive consumption - Department cannot compel assessee to perpetuate the illegality and in such circumstances the whole exercise was revenue neutral: HC75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCPM says NO to religion-based reservationCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Since the objective of Central Government in imposing ban with immediate effect was to avert a food crisis in the country, a strict compliance of exemption conditions would further the said intent of the Notification(s): HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesCX - Appellant should not be left without an opportunity to put-forth his case on merits, particularly, when matter was decided during period of Covid-19 pandemic and also appellant contends that no opportunity of virtual hearing was granted by adjudicating authority: HCKiller floods - 228 killed in Kenya + 78 in BrazilI-T - Grant of registration u/s 12A can't be denied by invoking Sec 13(1)(b), as provisions of section 13 would be attracted only at time of assessment and not at time of grant of registration: ITATFlight cancellation case: Qantas accepts USD 66 mn penaltyI-T- Joint ownership in two residential properties at the time of sale of the original asset does not disentitle the assessee to claim of deduction under section 54F of the Act: ITATIsrael shuts down Al Jazeera; seizes broadcast equipmentI-T - If assessee was prevented from production of evidences because of its non-availability or delay in its retrieval coupled with ongoing several reassessment, assessee should be allowed to adduce additional evidence: ITATIndia to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarI-T- If assessee is otherwise found eligible, CIT(E) should grant provisional approval to assessee under Clause (iii) to First Proviso to section 80G(5): ITATLabour Party candidate Sadiq Khan wins record third term as London MayorI-T - Donation made to trust which is otherwise not approved during relevant period as per CBDT Circular, is not eligible for deduction u/s 35(1): ITATGovt scraps ban on export of onionI-T- Assessee could have filed application in Form No.10AB on or before 30.09.2022, which assessee failed to do : ITATUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedI-T- AO erred in making addition for completed/non abated assessment as no incriminating material found during course of search :ITAT
 
Customs - Soft shell filter for blood bags is classifiable under CTH 9018 90 99 and is eligible for CVD exemption under Notification 12/2012 CE - CBEC Circular No 19/2013 dated 09.05.2013 quashed: High Court

By TIOL News Service

ERNAKULAM, JULY 22, 2016: THE petitioner, being a company engaged in manufacture of blood bags and dealers of blood transfusion apparatus, imported soft shell filter for blood bags. The item was classified under chapter heading 9018 90 99 and petitioner claimed exemption under Sl.No.309(i) of notification No. 12/2012 CE dated 17/3/2012. However, the department viewed that the goods imported by the petitioner is "filtering equipment for filtration of blood" is classifiable under Chapter heading 8421 2900 based on Note 2(a) of Chapter 90. Reference is also made to Board's Circular No. 19/2013 issued by CBEC, wherein it was clarified that filtering apparatus for filtration of blood is classifiable under chapter heading 8421 29 00. Therefore, according to the department, an additional 12% tax is leviable.

The main contention urged by the petitioner is regarding the validity of Circular No. 19/2013. Petitioner submitted that these filters which are the subject matter in issue are used in the dialysis machines and have no use other than for the aforesaid purpose. It is part of the system by which dialysis takes place, when there is a specific provision for blood purifying system in tariff item 9018 90 31, there is no reason why it should be classified under the general head of filters.

After hearing both sides, the High Court held:

+ There is no dispute about the fact that the products in question are used for the purpose of renal dialysis equipment. What was considered by the authorities in the Circular is with reference to 'Disposable Sterilized Dialyser' and 'Micro Barrier'. It is observed that the complete machine which performs the blood purifying is classifiable in sub heading 9018 90 and is covered under tariff item 9018 90 31. It is also an admitted fact that the 'Disposable Sterilized Dialyser ' and 'Micro Barrier' are part of the main equipment which is classified under sub heading 9019 90, Reference is made to 2 nd paragraph of Part III of the HS General Explanatory Note to Chapter 90 for guidance for the application of Note 2(a) of Chapter 90. It says, parts which in themselves constitute articles falling in any particular heading of Chapter 90, 84, 85 or 91 are in all cases to be classified in their respective headings.

+ But when it is apparent that these equipments are filters and qualifies as parts of blood purifying system under the sub heading 9018. 90, there is no reason to give a different interpretation unless it constitutes articles falling in any particular heading.

+ The contention urged by the respondents while supporting the Circular is that in view of the specific entry under sub heading 8421, the item cannot come under Chapter 90. But a bare reading of various tariff items coming under Chapter sub heading 8421 do not indicate that a component for filtering blood could be included in any of the items coming under 8421

+ Note 2(b) clearly applies to the fact situation since there are no entries in the tariff head items which can take care of parts and accessories of renal dialysis equipment which comes under the tariff head 9018 90 31.

+ Note 2(b) applies to the facts of the case and these components can be said to be parts or accessories suitable for use solely with the machines as stipulated under tariff item 9018 90 31.

+ Therefore, it is held that the Circular is not in terms with the statutory provisions and is liable to be set aside.

+ Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed.

(See 2016-TIOL-1473-HC-KERALA-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.