News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
Treading the GST Path - VI - Impact on Construction sector

SEPTEMBER 12, 2016

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

1.0 THE Construction sector's tryst with Service Tax is an epic by itself. Same is the case with the sector's engagement with Sales Tax / VAT. So, the sector is looking upon GST as a messiah. Will GST prove to be one?

2.0 The problems of the construction sector is due to the dual taxing powers simultaneously operating on them, each pitted against the other. To elaborate, after the 42 nd Constitutional amendment, whereby transfer of property in goods during execution of a works contract is deemed as a sale, the State Governments have got the authority to tax such deemed sale. Though the service component of the works contract is in the Centre's taxation domain from the beginning, the Centre sought to harness it only from 2004, by way of levying service tax. The roller coaster ride from then on, came to an end with the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Vs L & T Ltd - 2015-TIOL-187-SC-ST.

3.0 The following are the major problems of the construction sector with regard to taxation.

- Often there is a overreach by one Government into other's domain, especially in terms of valuing their respective taxing events. The value assessed for the State levy is not accepted by the Centre for exclusion and vice versa.

- The composition schemes under the State levy come with lot of impractical conditions.

- The Central duties paid on inputs become a cost.

- The values fixed by each enactment are not realistic and very often one end up paying taxes on a value more than 100, though the total value of the contract is only 100.

4.0 The basic feature of GST is that it seeks to bid adieu to the concept of division of taxation powers between the Centre and States, so that the instances of one Government encroaching upon the domain of other could be avoided. Both Governments will have concurrent taxing jurisdiction on supplies of goods and services. Hence, the need to identify whether the transaction is one of sale or of service, the much talked about aspects theory, the Dominant nature test, Pith and substance, etc. would all be consigned to legal history. This would mean a lot for the construction sector in terms of avoiding disputes.

5.0 Assuming that the rates of CGST and SGST would be equal, there would be no allegations of offloading the values from highly taxed domain to less taxed domain.

6.0 At present, the Central duties (Excise duty, etc.) paid on inputs used for construction is not allowed as cenvat credit for the Works Contractor, inasmuch as there is no Central levy on transfer of property in such goods. Only the State levies (VAT, etc.) can be allowed as Input tax credit. This leads to cost escalation.

6.1 Under the GST regime, as per Schedule II to the model Act, "works contracts" including the incidental transfer of property in goods therein is treated as a supply of service. Such supply of service would be liable to both CGST / SGST - if it is an intra State Supply, and IGST - if it is an inter State supply. Thus the CGST / SGST / IGST paid on various inputs and input services used for the supply of works contract service should be allowed as Input Tax Credit without any restriction. If at all, only the present restriction of not allowing any cenvat credit / input tax credit pertaining to the duties and taxes paid on construction related activities, to the end users, may continue under GST regime, if the present policy in this regard is sought to be continued. Hence, there is every reason to believe that all the GST paid on inward supplies of goods and services would be entitled for Input Tax Credit for a Works Contract Service Provider.

Before parting:

The various restrictions on availing cenvat credit, contained in Section 16 (9) of the model Act is rather confusingly worded, which eludes clarity and this aspect has already been highlighted in the first article under this series - Treading the GST Path - I - A "Principal" mismatch.

Also See : Treading the GST Path- V - Transitional Credit - Explained

Treading the GST Path-IV - Transitional Credit - Explained

Treading the GST Path-III - Certain snippets on ITC

Treading the GST Path - II - ISD - Decodifed

Treading the GST Path-I - A 'Principal' mismatch?

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.