News Update

Maneka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemST - Appellant was performing statutory functions as mandated by EPF & MP Act, and the Constitution of India, as per Board's Circular 96/7/2007-ST , services provided under Statutory obligations are not taxable: CESTATKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamI-T - Scrutiny assessment order cannot be assailed where assessee confuses it with order passed pursuant to invocation of revisionary power u/s 263: HCHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningI-T - Assessment order invalidated where passed in rushed manner to avoid being hit by impending end of limitation period: HCColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashI-T - Additions framed on account of bogus purchases merits being restricted to profit element embedded therein, where AO has not doubted sales made out of such purchases: HCIndia to host prestigious 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative MeetingI-T - Miscellaneous Application before ITAT delayed by 1279 days without any just causes or bona fide; no relief for assessee: HCAdani Port & SEZ secures AAA RatingI-T - Assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 54EC on account of investment made in REC Bonds, provided both investments were made within period of six months as prescribed u/s 54EC: ITATNominations for Padma Awards 2025 beginsI-T - PCIT cannot invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 when there is no case of lack of enquiry or adequate enquiry on part of AO: ITATMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDOI-T - If purchases & corresponding sales were duly matched, it cannot be said that same were made out of disclosed sources of income: ITATViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockI-T - Reopening of assessment is invalid as while recording reasons for reopening of assessment, AO has not thoroughly examined materials available in his own record : ITAT
 
Cus - Import of equipment - Department has no jurisdiction to question certificate issued by Sports Authority of India: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, SEPT 19, 2016: ALL India Tennis Association, New Delhi imported a consignment of Pulse Sprint Flat Bed Treadmill, Pulse Ascent Elevated Treadmill, Pursuit Cycle and Pace Stepper and claimed benefit of Notfn. No. 146/94-Cus. dt.13.07.1994; Notfn. No. 16/2000 dt.1.3.2000 Sr. No. 331 (Condition No. 76).

It was the contention of the department that these imported items do not fall under the exemption Entry No. 331 as these items are General Physical Exercise equipments used in gymnasium falling under CTH 9506.

On the objection of the department,the importers paid duty of Rs.3,53,419/- under protest and thereafter claimed refund of the same.

The adjudicating authority rejected the refund claim on the ground that the imported goods being general physical exercise equipment are not used in a National or International Championship or Competition to be held in India or abroad and hence the exemption claimed is not available.

Having failed before the Commissioner (Appeals), the appellant is before the CESTAT.

None appeared on behalf of the appellant.

The AR reiterated the stand taken by the department.

Notification No. 16/2000-Cus.exempts all goods of Chapter 94 which is required for games and sports, subject to compliance of condition No. 76 of the Notification that reads:

"If certified by the apex body in relation to the concerned game or sport (the highest organization, other than Government, by which the game or sport is controlled or regulated), that the requisites for games and sports are required to be used in a national or international championship or competition to be held in India or abroad."

The Bench, after noting the above, observed -

++ It is provided that the exemption is available on the condition that apex body certifies that the requisites for games and sports are required to be used in a national or international championship or competition to be held in India or abroad.

++ From the certificate (provided by appellant), it is clear that the Sports Authority of India has certified the specific imported goods that the said equipments are used for national or international tournaments.

++ As per the Condition 76 only certification from the apex body is required, so long that condition is complied with exemption is available to the imported goods. Moreover, for the purpose of national or international tournaments, the fitness of the player is the primary criteria for preparing to face the competition of national or international tournaments. Therefore, it cannot be said that these fitness equipments are not used by the appellant for national or international tournaments.

++ We are, therefore, of the considered view that on the basis of certificate dt. 14.6.2000 issued by Sport Authority of India addressed to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Bombay in respect of equipments imported by the appellant, exemption notification is clearly admissible to the appellant.

Holding that the department has no jurisdiction to question the certificate issued by Sports Authority of India, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2016-TIOL-2443-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS