News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
GVAT - Whether Revenue can exercise power of provisional attachment even in cases of disputed tax liability under Gujarat Entry tax Act - NO: HC

By TIOL News Service:

AHMEDABAD, OCT 16, 2016: THE issue is - Whether the Authorities under Gujarat VAT Act can exercise their power of provisional attachment enshrined u/s 45(1), in cases of disputed tax liability under Gujarat Entry tax Act. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee had preferred the present petition challenging the order, whereby the Asst CCT had placed the assessee's bank account under provisional attachment in exercise of powers u/s 45(1) of Gujarat VAT, 2005. This power was exercised in view of the possible tax, interest and penalty demand of Rs.20 lakhs concerning the assessee. The case of the assessee was that much of its possible tax liability would be relatable to entry tax and Gujarat Entry tax Act do not vest power of provisional attachment on the CCT. Further, the assessee also submitted that it had already deposited a sum of Rs.11 lakhs with the authorities under protest towards the possible basic duty liability.

On appeal, the High Court held that,

1. In the present case, admittedly, the assessment concerning the disputed tax liability of the assessee is not yet completed. What appears substantially undisputable is that the amount of Rs.20 lakhs quoted in the impugned order by way of assessee's possible tax, interest and penalty liability, mainly comprises of the disputed entry tax. The fact that the disputed tax liability represents in substantial measure, entry tax, is not in dispute. The Entry Tax Act does not contain any provision for provisional attachment.

2. Section 45(1) of the VAT Act, of course, authorizes the competent authority to exercise the power of provisional attachment pending the proceedings for assessment or reassessment of turnover escaping assessment to protect the interest of Revenue. Such power obviously cannot be imported for the purpose of the Entry Tax Act.

3. In facts of the present case therefore, when we notice that the assessee has already deposited a sum of Rs.11 lakhs towards the initial estimated tax penalty and interest liability of Rs.20 lakhs, which in any case, includes substantial portion of disputed entry tax, we would not permit the authorities to provisionally attach the assessee's bank account. Under the circumstances, impugned order is set aside.

(See 2016-TIOL-2473-HC-AHM-VAT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.