News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
Cus - Committee has not applied its mind - Mere accordance of approval to appeal because impugned order is not in favour of Revenue is not proper discharge of duties statutorily assigned: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, OCT 27, 2016: AGGRIEVED by the order dated 8th April 2015 passed by the Commissioner(A), the Committee of Commissioners vide its review order dated 13th August 2015 authorised the Deputy Commissioner to file an appeal before the CESTAT. The appeal was filed on 9th October 2015. Along with said appeals, applications for condonation of delay has also been filed.

In the matter of the applications filed for condonation of delay, the CESTAT remarked -

 

 

"3. On a perusal of the records, we find that the applications for condonation of delay is conspicuously bereft of any cogent justification for the delay. An affidavit dated 6th April 2016 was filed by an authorized officer to explain the delay all of which relate to non-traceability of the file and the delay in receiving inputs from the assessing group."

As for the affidavit contents, the Bench made some scathing observations.

The CESTAT observed -

++ It would appear that the Committee of Commissioners left it to the lower authorities to ascertain and prepare the grounds for appeal against the impugned order; there was otherwise no need to seek the view of the assessing group.

++ This, we are afraid, does not constitute application of mind expected of officers occupying senior position in the tax hierarchy. The devolution of such authority within the statute annexes the obligation to discharge that function with due diligence and comprehension of the issue that is sought to be appealed against. Mere accordance of approval to appeal because the impugned order is not in favour of Revenue is not proper discharge of duties statutorily assigned.

++ We also take note that the competent Committee of Commissioners did not appear to have had knowledge of the delay. The exercise of jurisdiction to review is to be taken up with full cognizance of the circumstances connected with the appeal. Lack thereof, including that of delay, vitiates the review proceedings as the competent committee has not been enabled to apply its mind to the issue.

In fine, the applications seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal were dismissed and consequently the appeals too met the same fate.

(See 2016-TIOL-2791-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.