News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
Exemption from Ed Cess and SHE cess on clean energy cess under Notifications No 28/2010 CE and No.29/2010 CE cannot be made applicable to excise duty imposed on coal - Demand of Ed Cess and SHE Cess upheld: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

HYDERABAD, NOV 03, 2016: THE appellant is engaged in the mining and sale of coal. The Appellant has obtained Registration under the Clean Energy Cess Rules, 2010 with effect from July 01, 2010 and has been discharging Clean Energy Cess at the rate of Rs. 50/- per metric ton on the removal of Coal from their mine.

The Central Government issued Notification No. 28/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 and Notification No. 29/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 granting exemption from payment of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess (hereinafter referred to S.H.E Cess) respectively to goods on which Clean Energy Cess is leviable - as specified in the Tenth Schedule of the Finance Act, 2010, which, inter alia includes Coal.

Coal was attracting Nil rate of duty upto Feb, 2011 in the First Schedule to CETA, 1985 with effect from March 01, 2011 the Finance Act, 2011 introduced Excise Duty on Coal, where under the manufacturer was granted an option of discharging Excise Duty either at the rate of 1% provided CENVAT credit of inputs, input services and capital goods used for production of coal is not availed or5% with the facility of CENVAT credit. The Appellant opted to remove Coal on payment of 5% Excise Duty.

On introduction of Excise Duty, the Appellant was advised that Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess is not payable on removal of Coal in view of the exemption granted under Notification No. 28/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 and Notification No. 29/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010.The department issued show cause notices proposing to recover Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess on the quantity of Coal removed during periods under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 along with applicable interest and penalty.On adjudication the lower authority confirmed the proposals in the notices along with interest. Hence these appeals.

The appellant contended that the exemption under Notification No. 28/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 and Notification No. 29/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 is applicable not only to clean energy cess, but also to excise duty levied under the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal upheld the demand by holding inter alia that:

+ Section 83(5) of Finance Act, 2010 clearly lays down that Clean Energy Cess shall be in addition to any Cess or Duty leviable on the goods specified in the Tenth Schedule or under any other law for the time being in force, which shows that Clean Energy Cess is only one of the duties of Excise leviable on coal, limited to the said Tenth Schedule. Hence, an exemption from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess on Clean Energy Cess does not mean exemption from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess on Central Excise Duty. Since the Basic Excise Duty on coal was introduced only w.e.f 2011, it is incongruous that a notification issued in 2010 can exempt E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess on Basic Excise Duty, because E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess has to be calculated on the aggregate of Central Excise Duty.

+ It is also noted that vide the Finance Bill, 2015 which subsequently was passed in Parliament and received the assent of the President, inter alia, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess leviable on all excisable goods were fully exempted. However, the Government, with the approval of the legislature, considered it necessary to issue separate notifications for rescinding the 2010 notification which exempted Clean Energy Cess from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess. The very fact that the Government found it necessary to issue a separate Notification No. 17/2015-CE to rescind erstwhile Notification No. 28 and 29/2010-CE vindicates the conclusion that the impugned exemption from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess was initially available only to Clean Energy Cess, w.e.f. 22.06.2010, and that E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess was very much imposable on Central Excise Duty till the amending Notification 14 & 15/2015-CE dated 01.03.2015.

+ Even the CBEC had clarified vide Circular 354/42/2014-TRU 22ndSeptember, 2015 that the exemption from Education Cess and S.H.E. Cess under Notifications No. 28/2010-CE and 29/2010-CE both dated 22.06.2010 (prior to 01.03.2015), is applicable only in respect of Clean Energy Cess leviable on Coal under Tenth schedule to Finance Act, 2010, hence Education Cess and S.H.E. Cess shall be leviable on Excise Duty on Coal.

+ The above discussions will put the final nail on the argument that exemption of E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess vide Notifications No.28/2010-Central Excise and No. 29/2010-Central Excise, both dated 22nd June, 2010, also meant that the Notification simultaneously exempted E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess on duty of excise. If this was the case, there would have been no need for the Government to issue, after four years, Notification No.15/2015-Central Excise dated 1stMarch, 2015 specifically exempting duty of excise from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess, on all excisable goods. Only because all excisable goods now stood exempted from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess w.e.f 1st March 2015, there arose the necessity for the Government to issue Notification No.17/2015-Central Excise dated 1stMarch, 2015 rescinding Notifications No. 28/2010-Central Excise and No. 29/2010-Central Excise, which had already exempted the levy of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess on the Clean Energy Cess leviable on coal much earlier on 22nd June, 2010.

+ In view of foregoing discussions, there is no difficulty in concluding that exemption from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess under Notifications No. 28 and 29/2010 both dated 22.06.2010 is applicable only with respect to Clean Energy Cess levied under the Finance Act, 2010, but will not be applicable with respect to Central Excise duty levied on coal w.e.f 01.03.2011. The issue is answered in favor of Revenue. The appeals are dismissed.

(See 2016-TIOL-2858-CESTAT-HYD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.