News Update

After US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyCore Sector loses steam in March; logs 5.2% growthTrump fined USD 9,000 for ignoring court’s gag orderNHPC to collaborate with Norwegian company for Floating Solar Energy TechnologyCT - Option of review cannot be utilised as a method of rehearing or appeal and there must be finality to a litigation: HCST - As agreement with foreign supplier was on C.I.F basis and it was foreign supplier who entered into an agreement with foreign shipping line for transportation of goods, hence appellant not being a service recipient was not liable to pay service tax on amount of ocean freight: CESTATOpenAI joins hands with FT to access content for training AI toolsCX - Entire chain, right from procurement of aluminium ingots from NALCO upto delivery of aluminium conductors, transaction was established and accepted by Settlement Commission, no scope for Adjudicating Authority to confirm demand of Cenvat credit: CESTATIndia’s oil import bill likely to come down to USD 100 bn in current fiscalCus - Warehousing - None of the provisions have been contravened or violated by appellants inasmuch as in respect of all B/Es, the activities were carried out with approval and necessary permission given by department as well as under supervision of Customs - goods not liable for confiscation/penalty: CESTAT7 Maoists including two women killed in police encounter in ChhattisgarhBaba Ramdev-promoted FMCG companies caught in a pickle over GST fraudsI-T- As per settled position in law, if let out property remains vacant during whole of relevant AY, then its ALV is to be taken as NIL: ITATUttarakhand Govt cancels manufacturing licence of 14 products of PatanjaliIMF okays USD 1.1 bn bail-out package for Pakistan3 police officers killed in shoot-out in CarolinaGaza protesters on Columbia Univ campus turn tin-eared to police warningsBus swings into gorge; 25 Peruvians killedI-T - Sale consideration received in cash in lieu of agreement of sale upon failure of deal, cannot be penalized u/s 271D: ITATBattle against cocaine cartel: 9 Colombian soldiers perish in copter crashI-T- Payment made by NSE to Core SGF is business expenditure allowed u/s 37(1): ITATICG, ATS Gujarat seize Indian fishing boat carrying 173 kg of narcotics9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in Chhattisgarh
 
ST - Appellants are reimbursed for providing additional services of security guard, emergency electricity generator, common sanitary block - by no stretch of imagination can these be included for purpose of taxability under RIPS: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 02, 2016: THE appellant was using their vacant factory premises for renting to twenty-four different parties and was recovering a rent of Rs.9,500/- from each party every month and paying service tax on the same, under the agreement with the lessee.

They were also providing certain common services like (a) Security Guard, (b) Emergency Electricity Generator (c) Common sanitary block for workers (d) repairs & maintenance of factory building and (e) vehicle expenses.For these additional services, the appellant collected certain amounts from the tenants.

SCN was issued seeking to include the amount collected under the head of "Renting of Immovable Property Services".

Lower authorities confirmed the demand, so the appellant is before the Tribunal.

It is submitted that the additional services provided cannot be considered as "Renting of immovable property service" and, therefore, no demand can be confirmed under the said head.

The AR emphasized that the said amounts have been collected under a common agreement and, therefore, should be treated as the amounts received against RIPS.

The Bench extracted from the common agreement and which is worded below -

"4. The lease rent per month is fixed at Rs.9,500/- from 01/04/2008 onwards. The Party No. 2 (lessee) shall pay 1 year rent in advance to Party No. 1 (Lessors), then from next year Party No. 2 shall pay monthly rent to Party No.1 within one week of next month regularly. If the party No. 2 fails to pay the agreed rent in time, then 15% interest will be charged on outstanding rent amount.

5. In above monthly agreed rent Party No. 1 shall provide following facilities to Party No. 2.

a) Underground exhaust air trenches for the looms

b) Humidification duct for looms with water supply

c) Fall ceiling and required partitions

d) Common cabin for loom supervisors

6. Party No.1 shall charge to Party No. 2 actual expenses which party No. 1 provide following additional facilities to raise monthly debit note before 15th of next month on payment basis to party No. 2.

a) Security Guard for all time 3 shifts

b) Emergency Generator arrangement provide if MSEB power failure

c) Common sanitary block for workers and cold drinking water facility as well as street lights.

d) Repairs & maintenance of factory building

e) Vehicle expenses"

Thereafter, the CESTAT observed -

"5. A perusal of the above, clearly indicates that Rs.9,500/- per month is paid for the purpose of renting of the premises. The other amounts are paid as reimbursement for services listed in para 1. These services can no stretch of imagination of renting of immovable property services and therefore, demand under the said head cannot be confirmed..."

The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.

(See 2016-TIOL-3123-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.